Awesome! How can we support this? Gj
On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 at 16:06, Kirk Pepperdine <k...@kodewerk.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I believe adopt would very much like to host a NB download. > > Kirk > > On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 22:03 Emilian Bold <emilian.b...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Apache rules do not go well with end user applications such as NetBeans > > IDE. > > > > The binary zip could be used as a baseline for building the installers > > and this fact itself gives it more legitimacy / security. > > > > OpenBeans could also distribute 'vanilla' NetBeans installers bundling > > AdoptOpenJDK. There's a small discussion about trademark here but I > > think it's allowed per another thread. > > > > --emi > > > > On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 11:51 PM Neil C Smith <neilcsm...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 at 19:41, Laszlo Kishalmi < > laszlo.kisha...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > I do not think that after this discussion we would get the exception > > > > from the board Geertjan might try to bring it up there as well. > > > > > > Well, we'll see. I personally have serious misgivings about ASF's > > > current position on "platform" dependencies when the world is changing > > > and moving to bundling that platform. And on the issue of binary > > > releases not being "official" - I've just signed 5 NBMs with an ASF > > > code certificate! I think the current position on either of these > > > things brings the sustainability of Java projects at ASF into > > > question, and particularly our long-term viability. > > > > > > I would really like a more forward thinking approach closer to > > > https://www.eclipse.org/org/documents/GPL_CE_Policy.php ! > > > > > > > As of me option 2 is questionable. > > > > > > Maybe! It's doable. I did start looking at doing this in an > > > InnoSetup based installer recently. > > > > > > > Option 3. is a bit hard to say, but if we can't produce proper > > > > installation packages, it would probably better to not create those > > > > packages at all, leave that for others. > > > ... > > > > 1. From 11.3 we remove the convenience binaries and installers from > > > > our download page > > > > > > If we go down that route, I don't think we should remove the binary > > > zip. In fact, that could be used as the basis for other people's > > > installers. eg. an AppImage build script could directly download and > > > embed that. > > > > > > There was some conversation a while back about AdoptOpenJDK making > > > bundled installers from our sources. That might be a good option to > > > follow up on again if we go down this route. I'd prefer fostering a > > > good relationship with a community focused distributor. > > > > > > Best wishes, > > > > > > Neil > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.apache.org > > > > > > For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.apache.org > > > > For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists > > > > > > > > >
