On Wed, 1 Jul 2020 at 14:05, Jaroslav Tulach <[email protected]> wrote:
> The purpose of this email is to build consensus of what the term
> "executable" means in the context of Apache NetBeans project.
>
> There has been a discussion on [legal mailing list](
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r0482d10f784f26f72b836f8480a13c7876ef8499f1f285166b1cf241%40%3Clegal-discuss.apache.org%3E)
> and it turns out that understanding the meaning of term "executable" is
> quite important.
...
> For Matthias 1, 2, 3, 4 and 7 are executables. I fully support his opinion
> and I want this to become the official definition of "executable" for the
> Apache NetBeans project.

I'm inclined to -1, but am curious as to the intention behind this
thread?  I think if anything it's not useful for us to make that
blanket determination, because it has different meanings in different
contexts.  And I think all of Matthias' examples apply.

In the narrow scope of that thread and the GPLv2 and classpath
exception, that was adapted from GCC Runtime Library Exception, and I
believe the updated version of that now uses target code in place of
executable?

I think in that case it should be considered in line with the text at
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gcc-exception-3.1-faq.html  And from that
I think trying to determine this for that particular case other than
individual modules are *.java files and executables are their
resulting *.class files is going to end up being counterproductive.

Best wishes,

Neil

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists



Reply via email to