I think it is fine to release 12.1 maven stuff without cpplite, just put
a note in the release notes/download page. Next time we would do it better.
The most important maven modules are the platform ones anyway.
On 9/5/20 6:39 AM, Neil C Smith wrote:
Hi,
OK, after 7 attempts we finally have a staged and closed Maven repo.
A latter problem required passing -DskipStagingRepositoryClose=true as
the plugin times out - not ideal when you've uploaded that much data
and it then deletes it all!
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachenetbeans-1068
Bigger problem - I've had to remove all traces of cpplite to get here.
The problem is the existence of cpplite-mi-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar in the
externals for cpplite.debugger. Tracked down one staging plugin error
to existence of SNAPSHOT in the artefact ID. But just removing that
still failing, because of missing references as far as I can tell, so
all of cpplite removed.
So, do we proceed with Maven vote with this staged repository without
cpplite cluster? Or something else?
And looks like existence of SNAPSHOT in any dependencies needs to be
-1 in future?
If anyone can do a once over of that repository before I kick off the
vote, that would be great too! Few things need some clarification in
our docs around this, but I think this is correct.
Thanks,
Neil
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
