FWIW, Apache NetBeans has already released the VS Code extension in the past: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/netbeans-dev/202004.mbox/%3CCALd%3D3dHVyENu%2Bj5o9stvP9_o%2B6FquTdzG7Wx-s-G5-_RdVeaDw%40mail.gmail.com%3E
https://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/netbeans/netbeans-vscode-ext/0.0.1/apache-netbeans-java-0.0.1.vsix So releasing a much improved version of it again if/as needed does not seem too difficult? Jan 6. října 2020 16:48:03 SELČ, Laszlo Kishalmi <laszlo.kisha...@gmail.com> napsal: >Well, > >First of all, contributions are welcome! Though, I have mixed feelings >about this one. Maybe I just do not see it at the moment. > >My question would be: What is in this contribution for NetBeans? > >I'm Ok with giving the java.lsp.server module inside NetBeans, as long >as it is not a dead code and seems to be maintained. In this case, >that'd be true. > >My problem is the packaging and distribution. Again what is the benefit > >for NetBeans doing so? > >It is probably fine if Oracle contributes some code that packs the >necessary code together and a package would be dropped out at the end >of >the build pipeline. It is also Ok if Oracle takes that package, bundle >it with something else and put that thing into the VSCode marketplace. > >S as I see it now. It would be an additional work for NetBeans >profiting >Oracle and VSCode. That does not taste good. > >Prove me wrong, I change my mind. But for now, code is Ok, automated >packaging if provided, is Ok. Doing the distribution and Marketplace >thing, shall be off NetBeans. > >On 10/6/20 5:11 AM, Jaroslav Tulach wrote: >> Hi there. >> >> NetBeans source code contains language server for the Java language >in the >> `java/java.lsp.server` module for a while. The module has been >integral part >> of NetBeans for several releases. In addition to that there is a >VSCode >> extension using that module - also part of the source ZIP releases, >but never >> part of any complementary binaries release. >> >> During the last few months the OracleLabs team worked hard on >polishing and >> improving the `java/java.lsp.server` module and associated extension. >Our >> interest was (not only polyglot) debugging. We believe we got it >almost >> working and we'd like to make our work part of the forthcoming 12.2 >release. >> >> We've been primarily [working on a >branch](https://github.com/JaroslavTulach/ >> netbeans/tree/java-lsp-server-debugging-attempt2) with occasional >backports of >> our work to the `master` branch (like #2309, #2393, #2386) of the >main >> NetBeans repository. We plan to continue doing that: >> >> * Sváťa Dědic works on splitting of HTML/CSS related modules to >minimize >> "weight" of the Java-focused extension >> * Martin Entlicher will prepare necessary enhancements to the >debugging >> modules and APIs >> * then we plan to integrate the `java.lsp.server` changes using the >previous >> enhancements >> * and eliminate the branch >> >> We'd like to integrate everything before 12.2 feature freeze (Oct 15) >and then >> work on bugfixes to polish the VSCode support for the 12.2 source >release. >> >> I assume there shall be no problem with that, if we keep Apache >NetBeans gate >> checks working and passing. Btw. if you are interested in working >with us, >> please start with the following README: >https://github.com/JaroslavTulach/ >> >netbeans/blob/java-lsp-server-debugging-attempt2/java/java.lsp.server/vscode/ >> README.md >> >> Please let me also describe that the ultimate goal of OracleLabs is >to promote >> GraalVM and provide the best tooling with the help of here-in >discussed >> extension. OracleLabs will distribute additional code to smooth the >> integration with GraalVM - e.g. OracleLabs will upload own >extension(s) to >> Visual Studio Code Marketplace. There are two options: >> >> 1. take the NetBeans 12.2 source release bits & pieces and include >them in >> OracleLabs extension(s) >> 2. help the Apache NetBeans project produce another convenience >binary, upload >> it to the Marketplace and make OracleLabs extension(s) depend on it. >> >> The option #2 is certainly more proper from an architecture >perspective. >> However can we make it? Work on 12.2 release is almost over and >adding such an >> undertaking such a late in the cycle may increase the risk of >delaying the >> release. How do you feel about it, Lazslo, as the 12.2 release >coordinator? >> >> Thanks for your opinions and thanks in advance for your support. With >NBCode >> people will be able to get the goodies of NetBeans (Maven projects, >Gradle >> support, Java code completion, Java debugging, polyglot debugging) >via the >> VSCode user interface! >> >> Best regards and let me admit I am so thrilled I can work on such >project! >> >> Jaroslav Tulach >> NetBeans Founder and Initial Architect >> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.apache.org >> >> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists >> >> >> > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org >For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.apache.org > >For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: >https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists -- Odesláno aplikací K-9 Mail ze systému Android. Omluvte prosím moji stručnost.
