> What is the benefit of this?

Project health. Bit rot <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_rot> is a
thing.

Cheers

On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 12:19 PM Geertjan Wielenga
<[email protected]> wrote:

> What is the benefit of this?
>
> Gj
>
> On Fri, 5 Feb 2021 at 16:12, Eric Bresie <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Question on the Netbeans project's plan for moving forward towards
> > introducing and utilizing features with newer Java versions.
> >
> > I understand the basic expectations at present are mainly build on Java
> 8,
> > while being possible to build (with applicable flags or jdk settings) for
> > newer java versions.
> >
> > At what point do we need to take the plunge and start actually using some
> > of the new features for Java 9 and beyond?
> >
> > When compiling with new java, I see
> >
> >    1. references to deprecated or removed interfaces so assume that is
> one
> >    thing that would have to be addressed.
> >    2. I see references to "source versions" (I saw one expecting server
> >    version 1.4) which also show up.  As I understand it, at some point
> the
> >    general behavior in some of that will be to only support a few jdk
> > version
> >    back so assume this might be a case for other needed changes [what
> > makes it
> >    a specific version and is it as simple as changing the source version
> in
> >    the project details or build scripts]?
> >
> > Assume doing so would require changes like
> >
> >    1. Any "JDK" specific build details might have to be addressed
> >    2. Address depreciation and source version differences
> >    3. Find existing code which are candidates for refactoring with newer
> >    java features involved
> >    4. Maybe leverage some JDK tools or utilizing netbeans Java
> "refactoring
> >    hints" for suggestions (i.e. changing loops to lambdas, utilized newer
> > file
> >    interfaces, etc.)
> >    5. Any dependency libraries would have to be updated with compatible
> >    versions.  This does have the added benefit of utilizing newer
> versions
> > in
> >    these as well which may include performance, security, or bug fits
> > benefits
> >    as well.
> >    6. Update any documentation (i.e. build/runtime environments)
> >
> > Given the recent javadocs build issues requiring newer jdk, it may mean
> the
> > time is coming sooner rather than later.
> >
> > I know this would be a major bit of work but I wanted to raise the
> > question.
> >
> > Eric Bresie
> > [email protected]
> >
>

Reply via email to