On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 at 20:52, antonio <[email protected]> wrote: > If you bundle GPL2+CPE files together the result _must_ be GPL2+CPE. > From the GPL2+CPE, 2.b) [1]
Well, you could remove the +CPE - another part of the problem. > As far as I understand the situation, it seems it's not clear that all > files (the whole project?) in nb-javac are covered with GPL2-CPE. Partly. I think we're pretty good there, particularly given Jaroslav's analysis. But there is the question of intention, and who should be asserting what the terms of any binary are. For us (the consumer) to need to do that is a little strange?! It's certainly not a surprise to me that Roy raised the concern of whether the CPE applies to the whole, or that the current resolution is that Oracle need to be the ones asserting that the terms of the CPE apply to the binary we want to ship. Particularly given previous related tickets. Best wishes, Neil --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
