On Tue, 8 Jun 2021, 18:02 Geertjan Wielenga, <geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com.invalid> wrote:
> JEP 411 explicitly mentions NetBeans as one of the projects making use of > the SecurityManager. > IIRC that was added in later? > > So, they knew, all along, of course, but just not the extent to which we’d > fight for it. Well, as someone who thinks JEP 411 is (probably) a good move, and the extent it's being fought might be an overreaction, a measured look at what can and can't be compatibly replaced with other mechanisms might also be constructive? Best wishes, Neil
