On Sat, 11 Sept 2021 at 17:08, Laszlo Kishalmi
<[email protected]> wrote:
> The only thing bothers me, that there are 5 new jars under
> java/maven/test/unit/data/mavenmock
>
> They are only test data, but they are real jars indeed. It seems that
> one even slipped through the 12.4 phase (I have not checked the jars
> that time.) Introduced in 95d4fd144eabe7dfc07fe7c5e7c8d81e1e26d013

They certainly didn't slip through in 12.4, and they're allowable if
they don't contain executable code.  Same as a few .zip files we have.
They were checked for that - it's even the reason for my comments on
this legal thread at the time
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rcddc30dd1f0c7f20709e09de7202d4d6885d6235a7fce1c1ab46e4ed%40%3Clegal-discuss.apache.org%3E

Mentioning here as you (or anyone else) might want to review and
verify they're allowable in voting.

> It might be not a show stopper, but we have to take a remedy action that
> these jars would be generated from real source during build time in the
> next release.

Real source might be a moot point, but whether the .jar and .zip files
we have should be generated is probably worth some thought, as
archives in general make reviewing more difficult (mentioned by others
in same legal thread above).  That bit is a discussion we should move
off the vote thread though.

Best wishes,

Neil

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists



Reply via email to