I'm sorry for stirring up the waters. I was acting on my memories of
release 10.0.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-1719
I do not think that the release process shall be hanged upon my +0, it's
not a -1 after all (as the jars does not contain compiled code).
Honestly, I like the idea presented by Matthias in
https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/3162 as a way forward in 12.6
On 9/11/21 11:10 AM, Neil C Smith wrote:
On Sat, 11 Sept 2021 at 18:58, Matthias Bläsing
<mblaes...@doppel-helix.eu> wrote:
I'm mildly irritated, that trivial JARs are considered a problem for
the 12.5 release, while a huge pile of files is completely excluded
from RAT scanning.
+1, but don't be irritated! :-)
Part of the problem is that we haven't updated our release emails to
cover them, or the branding folders with jar names that have also
caused similar concerns. It's something to look at, along with some
of the other text, before 12.6.
There is IMHO _nothing_ in this, that warrants doubts on the
cleanliness of the release.
+1 I did similar checks for 12.4.
I'll see if I can remove them all all, but for 12.5 IMHO this is out of
scope and also unnessary.
It's unnecessary anyway, except possibly on the point that was made on
legal-disuss about harder to review, and that's minor. And probably
pointless unless we decided to address all the other archive formats?
Best wishes,
Neil
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.apache.org
For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.apache.org
For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
