The difference is the packaged jdk. Codelerity uses tempting, FoAN uses the Azul Zulu variant of openjdk. Other than size and licence I do not known of any technical differences, because I have not studied them. I was told that FoAN is somehow bound to Zulu, so I complied.
met vriendelijke groet Pieter van den Hombergh Op ma 23 feb 2026, 20:57 schreef Peter Hull <[email protected]>: > On Mon, 23 Feb 2026 at 19:49, Pieter van den Hombergh > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > At the time codelerity installers were on line the FoAN installer page > was > > not linked to from the NetBeans.org download page. So probably no > downloads > > for NB28 from the FoAN site. > > Thanks Pieter. What I meant was - when NB29 installers are available > from both FoAN and Codelerity, will there be any practical difference > between them? > (As I understand it from Neil's message Codelerity will continue > releasing alongside FoAN) > > Peter > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists > > > >
