I think we should try to change as little as possible until the 2nd code donation.
Once the 1st code donation (i.e., 5a-d) is done, i.e., once that code is in Apache Git, we should not add new features or fix bugs etc, until the 2nd code donation is done. Until that point, we should do the absolute minimum with that code -- i.e., we should focus very narrowly on doing licensing checks and preparing that codebase for the first incubator release. The release will not have any new features and will not have any bugs fixed, instead it will purely and only have gone through all the licensing checks and requirements from the Apache side. That would be my vision for that code -- and that phase shouldn't last more than about two months, maximum, I believe. Gj On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Emilian Bold <emilian.b...@gmail.com> wrote: > I don't believe they can shut down the old repo until everything has been > donated. > > > --emi > > On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 5:03 PM, Javier Ortiz <javier.ortiz...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Sounds reasonable. My concern would be changes in between. Will this mean > > the current main repo would be shut down and using the new one instead? > > >
