Great.

Gj

On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 10:10 PM, Emilian Bold <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Justin Dugger from OSUOSL confirmed they could handle the whole 80 TB/month
> download traffic NetBeans has.
>
> Do note that OSUOSL is already part of the Apache mirror system (
> http://apache.osuosl.org/ ) which NetBeans will use for releases.
>
> So, we may still use OSUOSL for any non-release downloads (eg. nightly
> builds, etc).
>
>
>
> --emi
>
> On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 12:51 AM, Emilian Bold <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Well, problem solved then!
> >
> >
> > --emi
> >
> > On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 12:26 AM, Daniel Gruno <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 06/03/2017 11:23 PM, Emilian Bold wrote:
> >> > So our bandwidth requirements are not a problem? I was under the
> >> impression
> >> > they are quite large and we need to find solutions.
> >> >
> >> > Of course, I would prefer we use the existing mirrors.
> >>
> >> If need be, we can set up a dedicated box or two for this. 80TB on our
> >> own boxes would cost us around $100/month, it's not the end of the world
> >> really. But I think the mirror system will suffice. As said, let's try
> >> it and see if it works out :)
> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --emi
> >> >
> >> > On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 12:21 AM, Daniel Gruno <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On 06/03/2017 11:15 PM, Emilian Bold wrote:
> >> >>> Hello,
> >> >>>
> >> >>> I received a while back permission to mirror some NetBeans binaries
> (
> >> >>> http://hg.netbeans.org/binaries and such) on the Oregon State
> >> University
> >> >>> Open Source Lab (OSUOSL) infrastructure (http://osuosl.org/ ).
> >> >>
> >> >> Standard practice is to use the Apache mirror system (
> >> >> http://www.apache.org/mirrors/ ) which is split across 250+ servers
> >> >> around the world. If there is need for much more bandwidth (80TB/250
> ==
> >> >> 300GB/month per server, not that much), we can set up some dedicated
> >> >> machines to handle this, but I'd suggest we wait and see what
> happens.
> >> >>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Back then it was not a very demanding request in terms of storage or
> >> >>> bandwidth.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> I have now approached OSUOSL (ticket #29524) to see if we could use
> >> their
> >> >>> servers for the 80TB/month downloads we would need under Apache.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> They have been cordial but very slow in answering tickets in the
> past.
> >> >> This
> >> >>> new ticket will probably be answered in a week or so. (It would help
> >> if
> >> >> we
> >> >>> could get a more direct contact with them).
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Tom Wheeler mentioned long ago that OSUOSL used to be a NetBeans
> >> mirror
> >> >>> back when NetBeans had mirrors. Perhaps they want to support us
> again.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> --emi
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >
>

Reply via email to