> Having an Electron-like build and deploy system that uses the HTML/Java > library and a JVM rather than node. That sounds like a powerful thing to have > in our armoury for developers to use. The question of whether the IDE should > migrate to that if it proves viable - that's a whole other distraction for a > future time IMO.
We have that already for quite some time. The only thing missing are the non-commercial non-JavaFX presenters. And I think there's enough presenters around at DukeScript that prove it's possible to port to a new one like ECF or directly to Chromium Content API. What I would find way more interesting is a POC as Geertjan demanded. One that proofs that we could run the IDE on top of it. --Toni --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
