> Is anyone opposed for considering all committers to be part of the PPMC? > > Effectively, during incubation, there is no difference between the roles. > > If no one disagrees in 72 hours, the above will be the way it is.
-1 (binding) Not sure what the purpose of this is. We should have a vote result where people were voted into the PPMC. If they are not listed on whimsy but they were voted in, it's just a matter of fixing the records there via our mentors or the secretary. Note that Antonio, which was voted in, is listed as part of the PPMC. --emi ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On 13 June 2018 7:22 PM, Geertjan Wielenga <geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I checked this URL, which is accessible to Apache committers only, and I > > noticed that the people we thought we had voted on as PPMC members are > > listed as committers. > > https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/ppmc/netbeans > > ...which is not a problem during incubation, but can be a problem at the > > end of incubation when the list of PPMC members is taken as the basis of > > the new PMC, at which point 'mere' committers would be left out. > > Is anyone opposed for considering all committers to be part of the PPMC? > > Effectively, during incubation, there is no difference between the roles. > > If no one disagrees in 72 hours, the above will be the way it is. > > Thanks, > > Gj --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
