On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 5:46 AM, Will Hartung <willhart...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 3:40 PM, Geertjan Wielenga < > geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com.invalid> wrote: > > > > > Excellent. So, where is your DMG solution, please? > > > > Can you stop sending e-mails for the moment and create the solution that > > you're missing? Yes, maybe you don't know how to do that, though maybe > you > > can invest the time that you would have spent in replying to this in > > learning how to do what it is that you believe should be done? > > > > Apparently you're only allowed to contribute to this list if you have a > pull request pending. > Well, that would be the very least to expect when you dismiss the existing solutions as "these techniques are both, simply, terrible". :-) Gj > > That's fine. > > But, before I go, it's was not even clear there was consensus on what to > do, what was desired, and was positing potential alternatives. For all I > know, folks would rather have a MacPorts or Homebrew solution and tell the > MacOs users "Let them eat bash scripts!". > > That said, looking at the git zip download, there's most certainly evidence > of the ability to create the Mac installers, which was kind of my base > puzzle. These existed before, where's the scripts to build it? The actual > build scripts I can't find, I don't know if they are on/lost with the > Hudson server (I can't seem to connect to the one linked at the nb.org > page). All of the hudson.* directories seem to relate to NetBeans hudson > support, not the build. > > Finally, the Apache infrastructure has a build bot running on a Mac Mini. > If the original build scripts can be found, and the proper permissions > acquired on the Mac Build bot, then, ideally, the previous build can be > ported to the new infrastructure. > > Ideally, this shouldn't have to be a clean room reinvention of the wheel if > it were deigned to be something that the group still wanted to have > supported. > > But, I don't know. > > Regards. >
