So, if I understand correctly, the view is a combination of c) ("it is OK
if doing changes to the API is difficult", like writing compatibility
layers, more elaborate migration tutorials, updating existing plugins etc.)
and b) (making an occasional incompatible change).

I think I am fine with that, I just want to ensure the consequences are
understood. It is of course absolutely possible that a specific API won't
need any enhancements, and so will be fine.

One more comment inline.

On Sun, Sep 23, 2018 at 12:55 PM Peter Nabbefeld <peter.nabbef...@gmx.de>
wrote:

> The problem here is:
>
> 1. If every API is friend-only, nobody will be able to depend on those
> without first becoming a friend. Or You have to depend on implementation
> version. So, these APIs will never be reviewed by the broader community
> and will never be ready for usage.
>


> 2. If the API is public, You may break other implementors plugins.
> You'll usually never do that to just annoy them, but because You've got
> some serious problem without changing it. As a result, the API should
> become more stable, more usable, and of better quality in general.
>

Not sure about this: when an API is not designed to be enhancible
compatibly, and is not sufficient (i.e. needs to be enhanced), I suspect
preference will be given to making the change compatibly, even at the cost
of making the API less nice. So, over time, the API will probably be more
complete, but possibly less clean.

Thanks,
    Jan

Probably, for the time the major version of NB doesn't change, there
> should be a compatibility layer, if possible.
>
> 3. If the API changes, there needs of course to be a migration tutorial,
> which must be upgraded if there are still any questions around about how
> to upgrade the plugin.
>
> 4. Plugin developers are: plugin developers, so it should not be a big
> issue for them to update their dependent module, if there's a tutorial.
>
> 5. As sometimes developers loose interest in further maintaining their
> plugin, there should be the source available somewhere, so other
> developers could take care of those. Ideally, the plugins should also be
> licensed under AL2.0, so they could be supplied in some Apache contrib
> repository.
>
> So, IMHO modules should be friend-only for a maximum of 2 or 3 releases.
> After this, I'd expect them to be reasonable stable to make them public,
> so the community could experiment with those and probably make proposals
> for a better API. If the API changes then, most developers depending on
> the module will even be happy about the new possibilities. But they
> should also tell, if some change may make their usage of the module
> impossible, of course, so the problems could be considered early.
>
> Kind regards
>
> Peter
>
>
>
> Am 23.09.18 um 12:04 schrieb Jan Lahoda:
> > On Sun, Sep 23, 2018 at 11:03 AM Christian Lenz <christian.l...@gmx.net>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hey guys,
> >>
> >> please see my last 3 comments of this ticket. It explains, why it is
> >> important to have public APIs instead of Friends:
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-1035?focusedCommentId=16574478&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#comment-16574478
> >>
> >>
> > My personal opinion only.
> >
> > I think noone doubts the a public API is better for plugins. However, I
> > think that it is necessary that at least one of the following is true:
> > a) someone signs up to make a proper public API, that we will be able to
> > enhance compatibly
> > b) we accept that there are smaller or bigger incompatible API changes
> > (size of the incompatible change depends on the nature of the change and
> of
> > the existing API)
> > c) we accept that some changes to the API will be very difficult to do
> > (compatibly), maybe even so difficult that they won't be made (so
> difficult
> > that noone will sign up to do the change)
> >
> > So, I wonder what are the views of others on these.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >      Jan
> >
> >
> >> The Thing is, no one know, what other nice Plugins will come in the
> >> future, but everytime, someone creates a Plugin which Needs to be
> friend,
> >> depends on only the next release that someone adds it. That means, that
> >> this Plugin will first work only for the next release, if someone
> decided
> >> to add this Plugin as a friend. Same happens for every other Plugins
> that
> >> Comes later.
> >>
> >> It is not that everytime a user want to use the newest IDE, often
> someone
> >> stays at the IDE if there is Nothing really new for him/her to Change
> >> update. That means, that he/she could miss the Plugin, if it is relevant
> >> for him. In this release.
> >>
> >> And what happens, if someone removes the Plugin as a friend? That
> happens
> >> for Geertjans KendoUI Plugin. The Plugin worked some versions before,
> not
> >> now anymore, because it was removed from being a friend.
> >>
> >> Making APIs public makes much more sense for 3rd-party Plugin
> developers.
> >> I think HTML, JS, CSS, C/C++ PHP and whatever is there is stable enough
> for
> >> years to say: yes, make them public. And will there some exceptions,
> that
> >> the devs figure out, someone can fix it Maybe as a patch or for the next
> >> release, which is acceptable.
> >>
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >>
> >> Chris
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Von: Laszlo Kishalmi
> >> Gesendet: Sonntag, 23. September 2018 04:45
> >> An: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
> >> Betreff: Re: Public vs. Friend API Reloaded (Summary)
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >> This list is what we have inside the current codebase (Without Yenta on
> >> other locations.)
> >> I put those here which have 10+ friend marked. (The complete list is
> >> attached)
> >> Upon this list it could be a good choice to try make the following
> public
> >> (maybe for NetBeans 10):
> >> • gsf.testrunner
> >> • gsf.testrunner.ui
> >> I know that a few external language plugins are using those as well, and
> >> the API is quite a good shape anyway.
> >> What do you think?
> >> Generated using: find . -name project.xml -exec grep -H -c friend\> {}
> >> \;|sort -r -gt : -k 2 |grep -v :0
> >> ./ide/dlight.nativeexecution/nbproject/project.xml:147
> >> ./ide/dlight.nativeexecution.nb/nbproject/project.xml:145
> >> ./ide/web.common/nbproject/project.xml:68
> >> ./ide/gsf.testrunner/nbproject/project.xml:40
> >> ./php/php.api.phpmodule/nbproject/project.xml:39
> >> ./java/java.api.common/nbproject/project.xml:39
> >> ./ide/options.editor/nbproject/project.xml:39
> >> ./java/maven/nbproject/project.xml:37
> >> ./enterprise/j2ee.common/nbproject/project.xml:34
> >> ./profiler/profiler.api/nbproject/project.xml:32
> >> ./profiler/lib.profiler/nbproject/project.xml:32
> >> ./java/maven.embedder/nbproject/project.xml:31
> >> ./webcommon/web.clientproject.api/nbproject/project.xml:29
> >> ./profiler/lib.profiler.common/nbproject/project.xml:29
> >> ./ide/gsf.testrunner.ui/nbproject/project.xml:28
> >> ./php/php.api.executable/nbproject/project.xml:27
> >> ./ide/html.editor.lib/nbproject/project.xml:26
> >> ./enterprise/j2ee.api.ejbmodule/nbproject/project.xml:25
> >> ./ide/web.browser.api/nbproject/project.xml:24
> >> ./ide/lib.terminalemulator/nbproject/project.xml:24
> >> ./profiler/lib.profiler.ui/nbproject/project.xml:23
> >> ./java/maven.model/nbproject/project.xml:23
> >> ./java/j2ee.core.utilities/nbproject/project.xml:23
> >> ./enterprise/websvc.jaxwsmodel/nbproject/project.xml:23
> >> ./ide/team.commons/nbproject/project.xml:22
> >> ./ide/html.editor/nbproject/project.xml:22
> >> ./profiler/profiler/nbproject/project.xml:21
> >> ./platform/libs.jna/nbproject/project.xml:21
> >> ./php/php.api.editor/nbproject/project.xml:21
> >> ./java/java.preprocessorbridge/nbproject/project.xml:20
> >> ./ide/web.common.ui/nbproject/project.xml:20
> >> ./ide/terminal/nbproject/project.xml:20
> >> ./ide/terminal.nb/nbproject/project.xml:20
> >> ./java/j2ee.persistenceapi/nbproject/project.xml:19
> >> ./enterprise/javaee.specs.support/nbproject/project.xml:19
> >> ./webcommon/javascript2.lexer/nbproject/project.xml:17
> >> ./ide/xml.multiview/nbproject/project.xml:17
> >> ./ide/versioning.util/nbproject/project.xml:17
> >> ./ide/code.analysis/nbproject/project.xml:17
> >> ./php/php.api.framework/nbproject/project.xml:16
> >> ./ide/xml.text/nbproject/project.xml:16
> >> ./ide/versioning.core/nbproject/project.xml:16
> >> ./webcommon/javascript2.types/nbproject/project.xml:15
> >> ./platform/core.startup.base/nbproject/project.xml:15
> >> ./ide/editor.settings.storage/nbproject/project.xml:15
> >> ./enterprise/websvc.clientapi/nbproject/project.xml:15
> >> ./enterprise/web.project/nbproject/project.xml:15
> >> ./websvccommon/websvc.jaxwsmodelapi/nbproject/project.xml:14
> >> ./webcommon/javascript2.editor/nbproject/project.xml:14
> >> ./platform/core.startup/nbproject/project.xml:14
> >> ./java/j2ee.persistence/nbproject/project.xml:14
> >> ./ide/xml.axi/nbproject/project.xml:14
> >> ./enterprise/websvc.jaxwsapi/nbproject/project.xml:14
> >> ./websvccommon/websvc.saas.api/nbproject/project.xml:13
> >> ./java/whitelist/nbproject/project.xml:13
> >> ./enterprise/websvc.core/nbproject/project.xml:13
> >> ./platform/o.n.core/nbproject/project.xml:12
> >> ./ide/web.webkit.debugging/nbproject/project.xml:12
> >> ./ide/dlight.terminal/nbproject/project.xml:12
> >> ./webcommon/javascript2.model/nbproject/project.xml:11
> >> ./php/php.api.annotation/nbproject/project.xml:11
> >> ./java/maven.indexer/nbproject/project.xml:11
> >> ./java/javaee.injection/nbproject/project.xml:11
> >> ./java/j2ee.metadata.model.support/nbproject/project.xml:11
> >> ./ide/hudson/nbproject/project.xml:11
> >> ./extide/options.java/nbproject/project.xml:11
> >> ./enterprise/j2ee.sun.dd/nbproject/project.xml:11
> >> ./enterprise/glassfish.common/nbproject/project.xml:11
> >> ./platform/o.n.bootstrap/nbproject/project.xml:10
> >> ./java/java.testrunner/nbproject/project.xml:10
> >> ./java/java.j2seproject/nbproject/project.xml:10
> >>
> >>
> ./ide/xml.schema.completion/test/unit/src/org/netbeans/modules/xml/schema/completion/resources/project.xml:10
> >> ./ide/jumpto/nbproject/project.xml:10
> >> ./enterprise/web.jsf/nbproject/project.xml:10
> >> ./enterprise/web.jsfapi/nbproject/project.xml:10
> >>
> >> On 09/21/2018 05:26 PM, Tim Boudreau wrote:
> >> You may want to survey modules on Github that use implementation
> >> dependencies or use Uenta to bypass them. For example, I've been
> tweaking
> >> the rust module from github, which does tag with a couple of csl
> modules.
> >> Those should count toward "friends".
> >>
> >> -Tim
> >>
> >> On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 8:01 PM Laszlo Kishalmi <
> laszlo.kisha...@gmail.com
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> Dear all,
> >>
> >> I'd like to summarize whet happened on the "API Friendliness" issue:
> >>
> >> We collected a number of possible options on our previous discussions
> at:
> >>
> >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Public+vs+Friend+API
> >>
> >> Commenting these options remained really silent though. This means our
> >> Friend APIs most likely stay as they are now.
> >>
> >> I must acknowledge that adding new friends to an existing API is easier
> >> than ever having NetBeans under Apache umbrella.
> >>
> >> I plan not to give up on making some APIs public though. Regarding the
> >> low interest of making something big around this area, I think the most
> >> viable solution is:
> >>
> >> Option 4: Make Module Public when There is more than a Certain Number of
> >> Friend Dependencies.
> >>
> >> So sometime in the future I'm going to create a list of how many friends
> >> a module does have and share the list with you.
> >>
> >>
> >> Thank you all who participated in this effort!
> >>
> >> Laszlo Kishalmi
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
> >>
> >> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> http://timboudreau.com
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
>
> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to