I think no one reading this will understand what Jim is referring to here -- for anyone surprised at this intervention, this is in response to the PPMC voting on new committers at the moment, which is a process that takes place on the @private mailing list.
Gj On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 3:03 PM Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: > I have no vote in this matter, but as a member of the IPMC I want to > state how I would vote if I did: > > I would vote -0... I am somewhat concerned about how the NB's PPMC defines > and > awards merit. > > Merit is based on what people do, and have done. Not based on expected > or anticipated effort. Also, adding people right now, right on the cusp of > graduation also seems... strange. If they warranted membership, why weren't > the added previously? Why not graduate w/ the current PPMC and then, > right after graduation, vote on new members? Why also lump committer > and (P)PMC membership? > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org > > For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists > > > >
