FWIW I submitted at patch for lineendings that I don't believe will conflict with NIFI-655 On Nov 20, 2015 8:57 AM, "Joe Witt" <joe.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Getting closer! > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1122?jql=project%20%3D%20NIFI%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.4.0%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20ORDER%20BY%20due%20ASC%2C%20priority%20DESC%2C%20created%20ASC > > Key stuff left: > - Wrap up NIFI-655 uname/pword stuff > - Make the kafka client config a little more flexible > - Make the user experience better for processors requiring input > - Fix up the tail file stuff which we all now appreciate as being > extraordinarily edge case challenged > > Then > - Tony fixes line endings (except for tests which require specific endings) > - I will do RM to kick out RC > - We all do focused testing > - We do the vote > > We're a little behind the ideal timeline but these are definitely > things worth waiting for and we're still finding bugs during testing. > Once the popcorn stops popping as much (so to speak) we can zero in on > a release. > > Thanks > Joe > > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Joe Percivall > <joeperciv...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote: > > Per NiFi-1165: a discussion is occurring on the ticket: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1165 > > > > > > Overall, most of the issues are identified and pending a fix from Mark, > Oleg and I. The issues were encountered on two different windows 8 machines > by me and on windows 2012 R2 by Mark. My configuration is maven 3.3.3 and > Java 1.8.0_45 (on the machine I have in front of me). > > > > Should have a patch resolving the issues in the next couple days. > > > > Joe > > > > - - - - - - Joseph Percivall > > linkedin.com/in/Percivall > > e: joeperciv...@yahoo.com > > > > > > > > > > On Monday, November 16, 2015 10:42 AM, Sean Busbey <bus...@cloudera.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > re: NIFI-1165 I also have a windows 7 laptop I can test on. (though it is > > low power) > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Aldrin Piri <aldrinp...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> I have another set of eyes for NIFI-748. Will do so now. > >> > >> On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Tony Kurc <trk...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> > For those not watching commits@nifi > >> > I need another set of eyes on the review for NIFI-748 > >> > > >> > On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 8:33 AM, Joe Witt <joe.w...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > >> > > NIFI-1082 (this should move to next release unless a resolution is > >> > > imminent) > >> > > > >> > > NIFI-1108 (move to next release) > >> > > > >> > > NIFI-1139 (recommend moving to 0.5.0) > >> > > > >> > > NIFI-1164 (this should get fixed now - it makes builds unreliable) > >> > > > >> > > NIFI-1165 (should tackle now. have a windows laptop i can build on) > >> > > > >> > > Thanks for pushing tony. > >> > > > >> > > On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 8:18 AM, Tony Kurc <trk...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > > > Update: > >> > > > > >> > > > Presumably fixed by NIFI-1086 (Joe Percivall). Reviewed, awaiting > >> > > revision > >> > > > NIFI-61 > >> > > > NIFI-812 > >> > > > NIFI-980 > >> > > > NIFI-1009 > >> > > > NIFI-1086 > >> > > > NIFI-1133 > >> > > > > >> > > > Multiple Auths (Matt Gilman) no patch yet, making progress > >> > > > NIFI-655 > >> > > > > >> > > > Provenance Search Improvement (Oleg Zhurakousky) PR in, being > >> reviewed > >> > by > >> > > > Tony Kurc > >> > > > NIFI-748 > >> > > > > >> > > > Create a Getting Started Guide (Mark Payne) Review complete, being > >> > merged > >> > > > in by Tony Kurc > >> > > > NIFI-973 > >> > > > > >> > > > Line ending fix (Tony Kurc) Finger hovering over "go" button > >> > > > NIFI-1054 > >> > > > > >> > > > ExecuteStreamCommand (Joe Percivall). Reviewed, awaiting revision > >> > > > NIFI-1081 > >> > > > > >> > > > Provenance repository search (Mark Payne) original patch reverted, > >> new > >> > > > patch in development? Move to 0.5.0? > >> > > > NIFI-1082 > >> > > > > >> > > > Scrub code looking for @InputRequirement consistency (Mark Payne) > - > >> not > >> > > > sure how to attack this one > >> > > > NIFI-1108 > >> > > > > >> > > > * NEW * > >> > > > LogAttribute processor fix (Oleg Zhurakousky) - trivial fix? but > >> > breaking > >> > > > change? I recommend moving to 0.5.0 > >> > > > NIFI-1139 > >> > > > > >> > > > * NEW * > >> > > > Race condition Fix (Oleg Zhurakousky) - assigned but no patch. > Move > >> to > >> > > > 0.5.0 or 0.4.1? > >> > > > NIFI-1164 > >> > > > > >> > > > * NEW * > >> > > > Build on windows failing (Joe Percivall) - assigned but no patch. > I > >> can > >> > > dig > >> > > > in. (I submitted a requst for MSDN, but can take 8 weeks) > >> > > > NIFI-1165 > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 10:22 AM, Aldrin Piri < > aldrinp...@gmail.com> > >> > > wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > >> Scanned through and removed the 0.4.0 tagging for State > Management. > >> > > >> > >> > > >> Thanks for the suggestion. > >> > > >> > >> > > >> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Sean Busbey < > bus...@cloudera.com> > >> > > wrote: > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > Has anyone had a chance to do a pass through Feature Proposals > to > >> > move > >> > > >> out > >> > > >> > any that aren't going to make 0.4.0? > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NIFI/NiFi+Feature+Proposals > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 8:13 AM, Tony Kurc <trk...@gmail.com> > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-61 - awaiting an > >> > answer > >> > > >> > before > >> > > >> > > patch can be completed > >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-655 - Based on > >> feature > >> > > >> branch > >> > > >> > > activity, is close? > >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-696 - awaiting a > >> patch > >> > > >> > marking > >> > > >> > > method as deprecated (assigned to me, but if someone else > wants > >> to > >> > > take > >> > > >> > it > >> > > >> > > and I review, thats cool too) > >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-812 - a bit > >> confused > >> > > about > >> > > >> > > this > >> > > >> > > one. patch in NIFI-1086 will close this? > >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-973 - awaiting > >> review? > >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-980 - (see 812 > >> > > confusion) > >> > > >> > > presumably closed when NIFI-1086 is closed > >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1009 (same!) > >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1054 I'm at the > >> ready > >> > to > >> > > >> > submit > >> > > >> > > a patch at the 11th hour. .gitattributes may be a candidate > for > >> > > 0.5.0 > >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1073 - some bug > >> fixes > >> > > >> > awaiting > >> > > >> > > review. if we don't have review bandwidth can be pushed to > next > >> > > release > >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1081 - reviewed, > >> > > probably > >> > > >> > needs > >> > > >> > > revision. Presuming the revisions can be done > >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1082 - Unclear > as to > >> > > >> status. > >> > > >> > Is > >> > > >> > > this awaiting review? > >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1086 - Seems like > >> this > >> > > is > >> > > >> the > >> > > >> > > lynchpin for several tickets, probably should be a priority > >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1097 - Awaiting > >> > review? > >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1108 - Awaiting > >> > comment > >> > > >> from > >> > > >> > > Mark Payne. > >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1109 - awaiting a > >> > merge > >> > > to > >> > > >> > > master? > >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1127 - awaiting > >> > review? > >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1132 - awaiting > >> review > >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1133 - awaiting > >> review > >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1153 - awaiting > >> review > >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1155 - blocker > bug > >> > > awaiting > >> > > >> > > patch > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > Seems like we're in good shape. I will have some review > >> bandwidth > >> > > this > >> > > >> > > evening, so if you start reviewing, please note that in the > >> jiras. > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > Can we get answers for 1108 and 61 and contemplate a slip to > >> > 0.5.0? > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > Tony > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > > >> > Sean > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Sean >
