Sorry it was late :-) I simply mean the RC is totally available to be kicked out. But I'd like to see folks test the master a bit more before then. We just got all the tickets closed so I'd like to see us slow it a bit to ensure folks are really able to spend good time testing.
Thanks Joe On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Sean Busbey <bus...@cloudera.com> wrote: > "Before I kick out Apache NiFi 0.4.0 RC1 I propose we spend a day or so > doing the same sort of items we would have and if it is quiet-ish then > we proceed with putting out an RC. " > > we would have if what? > > On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 10:19 PM, Joe Witt <joe.w...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Team, >> >> As you can see here [1] we are 'done' as far as 0.4.0 known tickets >> go. I am ready to create the RC and would love to do so. >> >> Before I kick out Apache NiFi 0.4.0 RC1 I propose we spend a day or so >> doing the same sort of items we would have and if it is quiet-ish then >> we proceed with putting out an RC. There are a tremendous amount of >> tickets/items involved in this release [2] with a few that are rather >> substantive changes/features such as [3] for example. >> >> [1] >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1237?jql=project%20%3D%20NIFI%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.4.0%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20ORDER%20BY%20due%20ASC%2C%20priority%20DESC%2C%20created%20ASC >> >> [2] >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1122?jql=project%20%3D%20NIFI%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.4.0%20ORDER%20BY%20due%20ASC%2C%20priority%20DESC%2C%20created%20ASC >> >> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-655 >> >> Thanks >> Joe >> >> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Tony Kurc <trk...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > FWIW I submitted at patch for lineendings that I don't believe will >> > conflict with NIFI-655 >> > On Nov 20, 2015 8:57 AM, "Joe Witt" <joe.w...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> >> Getting closer! >> >> >> >> >> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1122?jql=project%20%3D%20NIFI%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.4.0%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20ORDER%20BY%20due%20ASC%2C%20priority%20DESC%2C%20created%20ASC >> >> >> >> Key stuff left: >> >> - Wrap up NIFI-655 uname/pword stuff >> >> - Make the kafka client config a little more flexible >> >> - Make the user experience better for processors requiring input >> >> - Fix up the tail file stuff which we all now appreciate as being >> >> extraordinarily edge case challenged >> >> >> >> Then >> >> - Tony fixes line endings (except for tests which require specific >> endings) >> >> - I will do RM to kick out RC >> >> - We all do focused testing >> >> - We do the vote >> >> >> >> We're a little behind the ideal timeline but these are definitely >> >> things worth waiting for and we're still finding bugs during testing. >> >> Once the popcorn stops popping as much (so to speak) we can zero in on >> >> a release. >> >> >> >> Thanks >> >> Joe >> >> >> >> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Joe Percivall >> >> <joeperciv...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote: >> >> > Per NiFi-1165: a discussion is occurring on the ticket: >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1165 >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > Overall, most of the issues are identified and pending a fix from >> Mark, >> >> Oleg and I. The issues were encountered on two different windows 8 >> machines >> >> by me and on windows 2012 R2 by Mark. My configuration is maven 3.3.3 >> and >> >> Java 1.8.0_45 (on the machine I have in front of me). >> >> > >> >> > Should have a patch resolving the issues in the next couple days. >> >> > >> >> > Joe >> >> > >> >> > - - - - - - Joseph Percivall >> >> > linkedin.com/in/Percivall >> >> > e: joeperciv...@yahoo.com >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > On Monday, November 16, 2015 10:42 AM, Sean Busbey < >> bus...@cloudera.com> >> >> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > re: NIFI-1165 I also have a windows 7 laptop I can test on. (though >> it is >> >> > low power) >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Aldrin Piri <aldrinp...@gmail.com> >> >> wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> I have another set of eyes for NIFI-748. Will do so now. >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Tony Kurc <trk...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> > For those not watching commits@nifi >> >> >> > I need another set of eyes on the review for NIFI-748 >> >> >> > >> >> >> > On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 8:33 AM, Joe Witt <joe.w...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> >> > >> >> >> > > NIFI-1082 (this should move to next release unless a resolution >> is >> >> >> > > imminent) >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > NIFI-1108 (move to next release) >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > NIFI-1139 (recommend moving to 0.5.0) >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > NIFI-1164 (this should get fixed now - it makes builds >> unreliable) >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > NIFI-1165 (should tackle now. have a windows laptop i can build >> on) >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > Thanks for pushing tony. >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 8:18 AM, Tony Kurc <trk...@gmail.com> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> > > > Update: >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > Presumably fixed by NIFI-1086 (Joe Percivall). Reviewed, >> awaiting >> >> >> > > revision >> >> >> > > > NIFI-61 >> >> >> > > > NIFI-812 >> >> >> > > > NIFI-980 >> >> >> > > > NIFI-1009 >> >> >> > > > NIFI-1086 >> >> >> > > > NIFI-1133 >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > Multiple Auths (Matt Gilman) no patch yet, making progress >> >> >> > > > NIFI-655 >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > Provenance Search Improvement (Oleg Zhurakousky) PR in, being >> >> >> reviewed >> >> >> > by >> >> >> > > > Tony Kurc >> >> >> > > > NIFI-748 >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > Create a Getting Started Guide (Mark Payne) Review complete, >> being >> >> >> > merged >> >> >> > > > in by Tony Kurc >> >> >> > > > NIFI-973 >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > Line ending fix (Tony Kurc) Finger hovering over "go" button >> >> >> > > > NIFI-1054 >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > ExecuteStreamCommand (Joe Percivall). Reviewed, awaiting >> revision >> >> >> > > > NIFI-1081 >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > Provenance repository search (Mark Payne) original patch >> reverted, >> >> >> new >> >> >> > > > patch in development? Move to 0.5.0? >> >> >> > > > NIFI-1082 >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > Scrub code looking for @InputRequirement consistency (Mark >> Payne) >> >> - >> >> >> not >> >> >> > > > sure how to attack this one >> >> >> > > > NIFI-1108 >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > * NEW * >> >> >> > > > LogAttribute processor fix (Oleg Zhurakousky) - trivial fix? >> but >> >> >> > breaking >> >> >> > > > change? I recommend moving to 0.5.0 >> >> >> > > > NIFI-1139 >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > * NEW * >> >> >> > > > Race condition Fix (Oleg Zhurakousky) - assigned but no patch. >> >> Move >> >> >> to >> >> >> > > > 0.5.0 or 0.4.1? >> >> >> > > > NIFI-1164 >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > * NEW * >> >> >> > > > Build on windows failing (Joe Percivall) - assigned but no >> patch. >> >> I >> >> >> can >> >> >> > > dig >> >> >> > > > in. (I submitted a requst for MSDN, but can take 8 weeks) >> >> >> > > > NIFI-1165 >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 10:22 AM, Aldrin Piri < >> >> aldrinp...@gmail.com> >> >> >> > > wrote: >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > >> Scanned through and removed the 0.4.0 tagging for State >> >> Management. >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > > >> Thanks for the suggestion. >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > > >> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Sean Busbey < >> >> bus...@cloudera.com> >> >> >> > > wrote: >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > > >> > Has anyone had a chance to do a pass through Feature >> Proposals >> >> to >> >> >> > move >> >> >> > > >> out >> >> >> > > >> > any that aren't going to make 0.4.0? >> >> >> > > >> > >> >> >> > > >> > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NIFI/NiFi+Feature+Proposals >> >> >> > > >> > >> >> >> > > >> > On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 8:13 AM, Tony Kurc < >> trk...@gmail.com> >> >> >> > wrote: >> >> >> > > >> > >> >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-61 - awaiting >> an >> >> >> > answer >> >> >> > > >> > before >> >> >> > > >> > > patch can be completed >> >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-655 - Based on >> >> >> feature >> >> >> > > >> branch >> >> >> > > >> > > activity, is close? >> >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-696 - >> awaiting a >> >> >> patch >> >> >> > > >> > marking >> >> >> > > >> > > method as deprecated (assigned to me, but if someone else >> >> wants >> >> >> to >> >> >> > > take >> >> >> > > >> > it >> >> >> > > >> > > and I review, thats cool too) >> >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-812 - a bit >> >> >> confused >> >> >> > > about >> >> >> > > >> > > this >> >> >> > > >> > > one. patch in NIFI-1086 will close this? >> >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-973 - awaiting >> >> >> review? >> >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-980 - (see 812 >> >> >> > > confusion) >> >> >> > > >> > > presumably closed when NIFI-1086 is closed >> >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1009 (same!) >> >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1054 I'm at >> the >> >> >> ready >> >> >> > to >> >> >> > > >> > submit >> >> >> > > >> > > a patch at the 11th hour. .gitattributes may be a >> candidate >> >> for >> >> >> > > 0.5.0 >> >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1073 - some >> bug >> >> >> fixes >> >> >> > > >> > awaiting >> >> >> > > >> > > review. if we don't have review bandwidth can be pushed to >> >> next >> >> >> > > release >> >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1081 - >> reviewed, >> >> >> > > probably >> >> >> > > >> > needs >> >> >> > > >> > > revision. Presuming the revisions can be done >> >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1082 - Unclear >> >> as to >> >> >> > > >> status. >> >> >> > > >> > Is >> >> >> > > >> > > this awaiting review? >> >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1086 - Seems >> like >> >> >> this >> >> >> > > is >> >> >> > > >> the >> >> >> > > >> > > lynchpin for several tickets, probably should be a >> priority >> >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1097 - >> Awaiting >> >> >> > review? >> >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1108 - >> Awaiting >> >> >> > comment >> >> >> > > >> from >> >> >> > > >> > > Mark Payne. >> >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1109 - >> awaiting a >> >> >> > merge >> >> >> > > to >> >> >> > > >> > > master? >> >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1127 - >> awaiting >> >> >> > review? >> >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1132 - >> awaiting >> >> >> review >> >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1133 - >> awaiting >> >> >> review >> >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1153 - >> awaiting >> >> >> review >> >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1155 - blocker >> >> bug >> >> >> > > awaiting >> >> >> > > >> > > patch >> >> >> > > >> > > >> >> >> > > >> > > Seems like we're in good shape. I will have some review >> >> >> bandwidth >> >> >> > > this >> >> >> > > >> > > evening, so if you start reviewing, please note that in >> the >> >> >> jiras. >> >> >> > > >> > > >> >> >> > > >> > > Can we get answers for 1108 and 61 and contemplate a slip >> to >> >> >> > 0.5.0? >> >> >> > > >> > > >> >> >> > > >> > > Tony >> >> >> > > >> > > >> >> >> > > >> > >> >> >> > > >> > >> >> >> > > >> > >> >> >> > > >> > -- >> >> >> > > >> > Sean >> >> >> > > >> > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > -- >> >> > Sean >> >> >> > > > > -- > Sean
