Sure Joe. I will create Jira tickets for those processors . I am also working 
on to move groovy lib dependency to parent nar level  to keep processor nars 
sleek.
Sumo 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Nov 30, 2015, at 7:25 AM, Joe Percivall <joeperciv...@yahoo.com.INVALID> 
> wrote:
> 
> Hey Sumo,
> 
> I don't know much about this use-case but just taking a quick look the 
> processors in that github repo they seem to be potentially a great addition 
> to NiFi!
> 
> I think you should consider creating a Jira and working this there. It would 
> a lot easier to get feedback and have a record of it on Jira than just on the 
> Dev list.
> 
> Joe
> - - - - - - 
> Joseph Percivall
> linkedin.com/in/Percivall
> e: joeperciv...@yahoo.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Wednesday, November 25, 2015 2:12 PM, Sumanth Chinthagunta 
> <xmlk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have first-cut  implementation of ExecuteRemoteProcess processor   at: 
> 
> https://github.com/xmlking/nifi-scripting/releases 
> <https://github.com/xmlking/nifi-scripting/releases>
> 
> I tried to provide all capabilities offed by groovy-ssh 
> (https://gradle-ssh-plugin.github.io/docs/ 
> <https://gradle-ssh-plugin.github.io/docs/>) to ExecuteRemoteProcess user.
> it takes three attributes: 
> 1. SSH Config DSL (run once on OnScheduled)
> remotes {
>    web01 {
>        role 'masterNode'
>        host = '192.168.1.5'
>        user = 'sumo'
>        password = ‘fake'
>        knownHosts = allowAnyHosts
>    }
>    web02 {
>        host = '192.168.1.5'
>        user = 'sumo'
>        knownHosts = allowAnyHosts
>    }
> }
> 2. Run DSL ( run on each onTrigger)
> ssh.run {
>    session(ssh.remotes.web01) {
>          result = execute 'uname -a' 
>    }
> }
> 3. User supplied Arguments which will be available in Run DSL 
> 
> anything that is assigned to ‘result’ in RunDSL  is passed as flowfile to 
> success relationship.
> 
> Any suggestions for improvements are welcome.
> 
> -Sumo
> 
> 
>> On Nov 24, 2015, at 8:19 PM, Adam Taft <a...@adamtaft.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Sumo,
>> 
>> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 10:27 PM, Sumanth Chinthagunta <xmlk...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> I think you guys may have configured password less login for  SSH (keys?)
>>> 
>> 
>> ​Correct.  I'm using SSH key exchange for authentication.  It's usually
>> done password-less, true, but it doesn't necessarily have to be (if using
>> ssh-agent).
>> 
>> ​
>> 
>> 
>>> In my case the  edge node is managed by different team and they don’t
>>> allow me to add my SSH key.
>>> 
>> 
>> ​Yikes.  Someone should teach them the benefits of ssh keys!  :)​
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> I am thinking we need ExecuteRemoteCommand processor (based on
>>> https://github.com/int128/groovy-ssh) that will take care of key or
>>> password base SSH login.
>>> 
>> 
>> ​+1  - this would be a pretty nice contribution.  Recommend building the
>> processor and then posting here for review. I'm sure this would be a useful
>> processor for many people.
>> 
>> 
>> ExecuteRemoteCommand should have configurable attributes and return command
>>> output as flowfile
>>> 
>>> host : Hostname or IP address.
>>> port : Port. Defaults to 22.
>>> user : User name.
>>> password: A password for password authentication.
>>> identity : A private key file for public-key authentication.
>>> execute - Execute a command.
>>> executeBackground - Execute a command in background.
>>> executeSudo - Execute a command with sudo support.
>>> shell - Execute a shell.
>>> 
>>> 
>> ​As we do for SSL contexts, it might make sense to bury some of these
>> properties in an SSH key controller service.  I'm thinking username,
>> password, identity might make sense to have configured externally as a
>> service so they could be reused by multiple processors.  Unsure though,
>> there might not be enough re-usability to really get the benefit.
>> 
>> Also, I'm thinking that the "background", "sudo" and "shell" options should
>> possibly be a multi-valued option of the processor, not separate
>> properties, and definitely not separate "commands."  i.e. I'd probably
>> recommend property configuration similar to ExecuteCommand, with options
>> for specifying the background, sudo, shell preference.
>> 
>> Good idea, I hope this works out.
>> 
>> Adam

Reply via email to