For what it is worth I agree with Moser's preference, as I understand
it, of having standard treatment of slashes within NiFi.  We should
def have that discussion for 1.x  As it is now we're basically
undefined and loosely it would be 'we use the slashes of the machine
that made the data' but we can/should do better.

Ryan: As for missing the cancellation i notice on Gmail for me that
the new subject doesn't reflect it is just right in-line with the
rest.  So I would have missed it too :-)

Thanks
Joe

On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Mark Payne <marka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Tony,
>
> I think that is accurate - but with the caveat that it is not necessarily 
> FetchFile that would have
> problems. I could see potentially using ListFile -> FetchFile on a windows 
> machine and then using
> site-to-site to push to a Linux Machine, which then does PutFile -- 
> essentially a way to mirror directories
> from a Windows box to a Linux box.
>
> In that case you would need to change the "path" variable to use the correct 
> file separator.
>
> It's something that I believe needs to be addressed but would not hold up a 
> release for it, since it
> is consistent with GetFile behavior and has a simple work around via the 
> Expression Language.
>
> Thanks
> -Mark
>
>
>> On Dec 7, 2015, at 3:50 PM, Tony Kurc <trk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Unless I'm misunderstanding Mark, we have a known bug for "inconsistent
>> path behavior between windows and unix-like operating systems" for
>> ListFile, which may cause a listing on a windows system not work on
>> FetchFile on a unix-like system,
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 3:47 PM, Joe Witt <joe.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> The RC1 cancellation notice went out earlier.  I'll send out another
>>> vote thread in a couple hours as the bug fixes are in.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Joe
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 3:41 PM, Ryan Blue <b...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>>> Is the consensus to go ahead with the release vote and this known bug,
>>> or is
>>>> this a blocker? In other words, should we continue to check this release
>>> or
>>>> consider the vote canceled?
>>>>
>>>> rb
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 12/06/2015 09:11 PM, Tony Kurc wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Joe - I'm putting a ticket in for a fix. Looks like it was introduced by
>>>>> the NIFI-1246 patch.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 11:36 PM, Joe Percivall <
>>>>> joeperciv...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Yup I saw the same behavior.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On the second try (doing mvn clean install -rf
>>> :nifi-standard-processors)
>>>>>> the tailfile error went away. The listFile error still occurred though.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Joe
>>>>>>  - - - - - -
>>>>>> Joseph Percivall
>>>>>> linkedin.com/in/Percivall
>>>>>> e: joeperciv...@yahoo.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sunday, December 6, 2015 11:32 PM, Tony Kurc <trk...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Er, just the tailfile error
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Dec 6, 2015 11:31 PM, "Tony Kurc" <trk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Joe, I had this happen and it worked on a second try.
>>>>>>> On Dec 6, 2015 11:23 PM, "Joe Percivall"
>>> <joeperciv...@yahoo.com.invalid
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Windows 8 build fails with maven 3.3.3 and Java 1.8.0_65.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I get these error messages:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> TestListFile.testRecurse:441 expected:<subdir1[/]subdir2/> but
>>>>>>>> was:<subdir1[\]subdir2/>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>> TestTailFile.testMultipleRolloversAfterHavingReadAllDataWhileStillRunning:381
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> expected:<[world]> but was:<[abc
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> These were not any of the same errors I saw last time testing on
>>>>>>>> Windows
>>>>>>>> a couple weeks ago.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Joe
>>>>>>>> - - - - - -
>>>>>>>> Joseph Percivall
>>>>>>>> linkedin.com/in/Percivall
>>>>>>>> e: joeperciv...@yahoo.com
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sunday, December 6, 2015 9:05 PM, Tony Kurc <trk...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I've gotten confirmation of CentOS 7.1.1503 x86_64, Oracle JDK 8u66
>>>>>>>> working
>>>>>>>> fine. and Fedora 23 not working with the same error that Andre
>>>>>>>> reported.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 5:50 PM, Tony Kurc <trk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'll also try it on windows 10 (again x64_64)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 5:36 PM, <joeperciv...@yahoo.com.invalid>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I can run it on Windows 8 tonight if no one else has.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Joe
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my phone
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 6, 2015, at 4:09 PM, Tony Kurc <trk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Signatures and hashes look good.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Built fine on Ubuntu 14.04 x86_64. I even cursed a little bit less
>>>>>>
>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> TestJdbcHugeStream!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> LICENSE, NOTICE and README look good.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Docs look good.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Binary ran successfully.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Did anyone try building on windows?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 11:46 PM, Aldrin Piri <
>>>>>>
>>>>>> aldrinp...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Followed helper provided by Joe.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Keys good.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Signatures good.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hashes good.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Source release builds and passes contrib
>>>>>>>>>>>> Required docs present and look correct.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Checked out copy of repo for specified commit hash and diff'd
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> against
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> source bundle.  Commit is as anticipated.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Ran convenience binary with varying templates all successfully.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Release notes and upgrade/migration guides look good.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Kudos to the community on all the efforts involved with this
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> +1, Release this package as Apache NiFi 0.4.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 10:32 PM, Joe Witt <joew...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello NiFi Community,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am pleased to be calling this vote for the source release of
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Apache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> NiFi 0.4.0.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The source zip, including signatures, digests, and associated
>>>>>>>>>>>>> convenience binaries can be found at:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/nifi/nifi-0.4.0/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Git tag is nifi-0.4.0-RC1
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Git commit ID is 191a56f54e3ec178f9f29e1287f23ba66dbf9e43
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=nifi.git;a=commit;h=191a56f54e3ec178f9f29e1287f23ba66dbf9e43
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Checksums of NiFi 0.4.0 Source Release:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> MD5: b69fd7ec632d7569906e20508058556b
>>>>>>>>>>>>> SHA1: 31d88ec7a8431ba5935370eb09be7a343c46411c
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/joewitt.asc
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> KEYS file available here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/nifi/KEYS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 152 issues were closed/resolved for this release:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12316020&version=12333070
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Release note highlights:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NIFI/Release+Notes#ReleaseNotes-Version0.4.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Migration/Upgrade guidance:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NIFI/Migration+Guidance
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NIFI/Upgrading+NiFi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> items
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and
>>>>>>
>>>>>> test.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Then please vote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache NiFi 0.4.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Ryan Blue
>>>> Software Engineer
>>>> Cloudera, Inc.
>>>
>

Reply via email to