Tony,

I think that is accurate - but with the caveat that it is not necessarily 
FetchFile that would have
problems. I could see potentially using ListFile -> FetchFile on a windows 
machine and then using
site-to-site to push to a Linux Machine, which then does PutFile -- essentially 
a way to mirror directories
from a Windows box to a Linux box.

In that case you would need to change the "path" variable to use the correct 
file separator.

It's something that I believe needs to be addressed but would not hold up a 
release for it, since it
is consistent with GetFile behavior and has a simple work around via the 
Expression Language.

Thanks
-Mark


> On Dec 7, 2015, at 3:50 PM, Tony Kurc <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Unless I'm misunderstanding Mark, we have a known bug for "inconsistent
> path behavior between windows and unix-like operating systems" for
> ListFile, which may cause a listing on a windows system not work on
> FetchFile on a unix-like system,
> 
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 3:47 PM, Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> The RC1 cancellation notice went out earlier.  I'll send out another
>> vote thread in a couple hours as the bug fixes are in.
>> 
>> Thanks
>> Joe
>> 
>> On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 3:41 PM, Ryan Blue <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Is the consensus to go ahead with the release vote and this known bug,
>> or is
>>> this a blocker? In other words, should we continue to check this release
>> or
>>> consider the vote canceled?
>>> 
>>> rb
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 12/06/2015 09:11 PM, Tony Kurc wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Joe - I'm putting a ticket in for a fix. Looks like it was introduced by
>>>> the NIFI-1246 patch.
>>>> 
>>>> On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 11:36 PM, Joe Percivall <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Yup I saw the same behavior.
>>>>> 
>>>>> On the second try (doing mvn clean install -rf
>> :nifi-standard-processors)
>>>>> the tailfile error went away. The listFile error still occurred though.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Joe
>>>>>  - - - - - -
>>>>> Joseph Percivall
>>>>> linkedin.com/in/Percivall
>>>>> e: [email protected]
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Sunday, December 6, 2015 11:32 PM, Tony Kurc <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>>>> Er, just the tailfile error
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Dec 6, 2015 11:31 PM, "Tony Kurc" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Joe, I had this happen and it worked on a second try.
>>>>>> On Dec 6, 2015 11:23 PM, "Joe Percivall"
>> <[email protected]
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Windows 8 build fails with maven 3.3.3 and Java 1.8.0_65.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I get these error messages:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> TestListFile.testRecurse:441 expected:<subdir1[/]subdir2/> but
>>>>>>> was:<subdir1[\]subdir2/>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>> TestTailFile.testMultipleRolloversAfterHavingReadAllDataWhileStillRunning:381
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> expected:<[world]> but was:<[abc
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> These were not any of the same errors I saw last time testing on
>>>>>>> Windows
>>>>>>> a couple weeks ago.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Joe
>>>>>>> - - - - - -
>>>>>>> Joseph Percivall
>>>>>>> linkedin.com/in/Percivall
>>>>>>> e: [email protected]
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Sunday, December 6, 2015 9:05 PM, Tony Kurc <[email protected]>
>>>>> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I've gotten confirmation of CentOS 7.1.1503 x86_64, Oracle JDK 8u66
>>>>>>> working
>>>>>>> fine. and Fedora 23 not working with the same error that Andre
>>>>>>> reported.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 5:50 PM, Tony Kurc <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I'll also try it on windows 10 (again x64_64)
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 5:36 PM, <[email protected]>
>>>>> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> I can run it on Windows 8 tonight if no one else has.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Joe
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Sent from my phone
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 6, 2015, at 4:09 PM, Tony Kurc <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Signatures and hashes look good.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Built fine on Ubuntu 14.04 x86_64. I even cursed a little bit less
>>>>> 
>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> TestJdbcHugeStream!
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> LICENSE, NOTICE and README look good.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Docs look good.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Binary ran successfully.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Did anyone try building on windows?
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 11:46 PM, Aldrin Piri <
>>>>> 
>>>>> [email protected]>
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Followed helper provided by Joe.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Keys good.
>>>>>>>>>>> Signatures good.
>>>>>>>>>>> Hashes good.
>>>>>>>>>>> Source release builds and passes contrib
>>>>>>>>>>> Required docs present and look correct.
>>>>>>>>>>> Checked out copy of repo for specified commit hash and diff'd
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> against
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> source bundle.  Commit is as anticipated.
>>>>>>>>>>> Ran convenience binary with varying templates all successfully.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Release notes and upgrade/migration guides look good.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Kudos to the community on all the efforts involved with this
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> +1, Release this package as Apache NiFi 0.4.0
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 10:32 PM, Joe Witt <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello NiFi Community,
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> I am pleased to be calling this vote for the source release of
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Apache
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> NiFi 0.4.0.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> The source zip, including signatures, digests, and associated
>>>>>>>>>>>> convenience binaries can be found at:
>>>>>>>>>>>>  https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/nifi/nifi-0.4.0/
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> The Git tag is nifi-0.4.0-RC1
>>>>>>>>>>>> The Git commit ID is 191a56f54e3ec178f9f29e1287f23ba66dbf9e43
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=nifi.git;a=commit;h=191a56f54e3ec178f9f29e1287f23ba66dbf9e43
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Checksums of NiFi 0.4.0 Source Release:
>>>>>>>>>>>> MD5: b69fd7ec632d7569906e20508058556b
>>>>>>>>>>>> SHA1: 31d88ec7a8431ba5935370eb09be7a343c46411c
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>>>>>>>>>>>>  https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/joewitt.asc
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> KEYS file available here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>  https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/nifi/KEYS
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 152 issues were closed/resolved for this release:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12316020&version=12333070
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Release note highlights:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NIFI/Release+Notes#ReleaseNotes-Version0.4.0
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Migration/Upgrade guidance:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NIFI/Migration+Guidance
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NIFI/Upgrading+NiFi
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> items
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and
>>>>> 
>>>>> test.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Then please vote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache NiFi 0.4.0
>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Ryan Blue
>>> Software Engineer
>>> Cloudera, Inc.
>> 

Reply via email to