Github user aperepel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/420#discussion_r64573388
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/pom.xml ---
@@ -235,6 +235,11 @@ language governing permissions and limitations under
the License. -->
<artifactId>json-utils</artifactId>
<version>0.0.20</version>
</dependency>
+ <dependency>
+ <groupId>org.apache.calcite</groupId>
+ <artifactId>calcite-example-csv</artifactId>
--- End diff --
This seems to be bringing in OpenCSV as a transitive dependency. Between
https://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-csv/ and OpenCSV, wouldn't the former
be more preferable? Most other contributions seem to be using the commons-csv,
few more features, etc. We don't want multiple CSV libraries, do we?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
