Would it suffice to make the existing 'component' field _required_ at ticket
creation time, and having components consist of 'C++', 'Java', & perhaps
'Both/All/*' as well? I imagine that is less effort than setting up and
maintaining a separate project and solves the problem, unless there are
advantages that a separate project would provide other than just issue
filtering by C++/Java.
Kevin
On 8/21/17, 11:18, "Andy Christianson" <achristian...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
Joe,
We actually already have that. There is a 'C++' and 'Java' component. It
works for the most part, but there are cases where it becomes ambiguous,
particularly on docker-related tickets.
I think there's certainly an argument that we need to just track components
more carefully. Having it be a separate JIRA would make it harder to make a
ticket ambiguous. Is it worth the effort/overhead of setting up another JIRA?
I'll leave that to the more experienced/established Apache parties since I
don't know what the overhead cost is.
Regards,
Andy I.C.
________________________________________
From: Joe Witt <joe.w...@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, August 21, 2017 11:10 AM
To: dev@nifi.apache.org
Subject: Re: Separate MiNiFi projects in JIRA
Can we recommend and setup a set of component names so that filtering
can be done reasonably?
If we do that would it be sufficient?
Alternatively we can ask ASF infra to setup another JIRA project such
as 'minificpp' but I'd like to avoid that until we're really sure we
want to bug em.
Thanks
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 11:03 AM, Andy Christianson
<achristian...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> Agree 100%. I have been bitten by this a few times. Is this something
Aldrin can do/have done?
>
> -Andy I.C.
> ________________________________________
> From: Jeff Zemerick <jzemer...@apache.org>
> Sent: Friday, August 18, 2017 2:56 PM
> To: dev@nifi.apache.org
> Subject: Separate MiNiFi projects in JIRA
>
> The MINIFI project in JIRA is currently a combination of issues for both
> the C++ and Java implementations. Some issues for the C++ project do have
> the C++ component set but some don't and it can sometimes be hard to
easily
> differentiate the issues by their titles. (There isn't a "Java" component
> so a useful filter is hard to make.) Has there been any consideration
given
> to having separate JIRA projects for the C++/Java MiNiFi implementations?
>
> Thanks,
> Jeff
>
>
