Thanks Joe, I will try to avoid to set processor to primary node. By the way, I've seen someone posted suggestion about Data HA in NiFi's wiki(HDFSContentRepository), is there a plan for that feature to be implemented and included in NiFi?
Regards, Ben 2018-01-09 14:25 GMT+08:00 Joe Witt <joe.w...@gmail.com>: > I'd avoid setting any processor to primary node only unless it is a > source processor (something that brings data into the system). > > But, yes, I believe your description is accurate as of now. > > Thanks > > On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 11:21 PM, 尹文才 <batman...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks Joe, so you mean for example, if I set one processor to run only > on > > primary node in the cluster and there're 100 FlowFiles in the incoming > > queue of the processor > > waiting to be processed by this processor, and the processor suddenly > goes > > down and then another node is elected as the primary node, those 100 > > FlowFiles will be kept locally > > in the node that went down and will continue to be processed by the node > > when it goes back online, these FlowFiles will not be available to the > new > > primary node and other nodes, > > am I correct? > > > > Regards, > > Ben > > > > > > 2018-01-09 14:08 GMT+08:00 Joe Witt <joe.w...@gmail.com>: > > > >> Ben, > >> > >> Data already mid-flow within a node will be kept on the node and > >> processed when the node is back on-line. All other data coming into > >> the cluster can fail-over to other nodes provided you're sourcing data > >> with queuing semantics or automated load balancing or fail-over as-is > >> present in the Apache NiFi Site to Site protocol. > >> > >> Thanks > >> Joe > >> > >> On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 11:05 PM, 尹文才 <batman...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > Hi guys, I have a question about data HA when NiFi is run in clustered > >> > mode, if one node goes down, will the flowfiles owned by this node > taken > >> > over and processed by another node? > >> > Or will the flowfiles be kept locally to that node and will only be > >> > processed when that node is back online? Thanks. > >> > > >> > Regards, > >> > Ben > >> >