Completely agree but isn’t MINIFICPP-786 an issue we could include as part of that?
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 6:35 PM Aldrin Piri <aldrinp...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think the intent is for this to be a fix release and wouldn’t include > any new features. > > > On Jun 26, 2019, at 17:47, Jeremy Dyer <jdy...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > +1 it’s time and lots of feature bearing JIRAs have been resolved > > > > I do agree with with Arpad however on the inclusion of MINIFICPP-786 > > > >> On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 5:37 PM Arpad Boda <ab...@apache.org> wrote: > >> > >> Happy to take RM roles as well. > >> > >>> On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 10:30 AM Arpad Boda <ab...@cloudera.com> > wrote: > >>> > >>> +1. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> As this release seems to be a Windows-focused, I would also consider > >>> adding https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MINIFICPP-786 > >>> > >>> On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 11:53 PM Marc Parisi <phroc...@apache.org> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi Everyone, > >>>> > >>>> I wanted to discuss releasing Apache NiFi MiNiFi C++ 0.6.1 with some > >>>> important bug fixes. We've had a few issues that impact Windows users > >> and > >>>> TLS with Raw Site To Site [1,2]. With these bugs addressed I think we > >>>> should look to releasing 0.6.1. > >>>> > >>>> I would like to scope this bug fix release to only critical and > blocker > >>>> tickets found after 0.6.0. Let me know what you think or if you think > >>>> anything else should be included that is critical to user operations. > >>>> > >>>> My time is pretty fragmented but will try my best to take on RM > duties > >>>> unless someone would like to try their hand at it. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> Marc Parisi > >>>> > >>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MINIFICPP-933 > >>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MINIFICPP-919 > >>>> > >>> > >> >
