I need to double check whether it needs rebased but there’s a docs PR for how to enable client TLS for ZooKeeper that I think would be good to include until the more integrated work is done:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/4092 Would anyone have time to look? -joey On Aug 3, 2020, 11:47 AM -0700, Joe Witt <joe.w...@gmail.com>, wrote: > ok cool. will keep an eye there once the other items land. > > Thanks > > On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 11:26 AM Bryan Bende <bbe...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I was doing some testing and noticed some framework level classes like > > prioritizers and authorizers were getting class not found exceptions. > > > > I believe it is related to the module/classpath changes we made as part of > > NIFI-7592 [1], so we should hold on the RC until we can resolve that. > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-7592 > > > > On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 12:51 PM Joe Witt <joe.w...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Mike, > > > > > > 7526 merged this weekend. > > > 7605 sounds like LoPresto is going to look at. > > > > > > There are a couple others (kafka 2.5 and smb stuff i'd like to get in > > > before I kick out the RC). Hopefully I can start that today. > > > > > > It is definitely time for 1.12! > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 3:13 PM Mike Thomsen <mikerthom...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > 7605 is the PR for the user agent discussion and 7526 is a small SSL > > > > refactor for the OAuth2TokenProvider that needs to be reviewed (as > > > > OAuth2TokenProvider is already part of master). > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Mike > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 12:14 PM Joe Witt <joe.w...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > ...ok looking like NiFi 1.12 is pretty well in hand. I plan early > > next > > > > > week to start pulling the release together. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 6:39 AM Pierre Villard < > > > > pierre.villard...@gmail.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Sounds good to me. Happy to take care of the RC duties for another > > > > release > > > > > > once the OIDC work is available. > > > > > > > > > > > > Le mar. 14 juil. 2020 à 21:31, Bryan Bende <bbe...@gmail.com> a > > > écrit > > > > : > > > > > > > > > > > > > Spoke with Nathan again and there is still more work to do for > > OIDC > > > > in > > > > > > > registry. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If no one objects, I'll work on kicking out an RC for 0.7.0 > > > tomorrow > > > > > > > morning, and we can land OIDC for the next release, likely an > > > 0.8.0. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 8:48 AM Bryan Bende <bbe...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I can be RM for an 0.7.0 registry release. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I spoke with Nathan and he has been making progress on the OIDC > > > > > > support, > > > > > > > > so I will wait a little bit to see if we can get that in, but > > if > > > it > > > > > > > starts > > > > > > > > taking longer then I'll proceed with getting an RC out. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 5:41 AM Pierre Villard < > > > > > > > pierre.villard...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regarding the NiFi Registry 0.7.0 release - if we can have the > > > > OIDC > > > > > > > > > support > > > > > > > > > in it, that would be great. I know Nathan is working on it > > > (based > > > > on > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > JIRA) not sure if this is something close to being ready. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Le sam. 4 juil. 2020 à 21:15, Mike Thomsen < > > > > mikerthom...@gmail.com> a > > > > > > > > > écrit : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > FYI, if we add in https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/4364 > > > and > > > > a PR > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > deprecate the elasticsearch v5 bundle we can free up about > > > 60MB > > > > in > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > convenience binary. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 10:43 PM Joe Witt < > > joe.w...@gmail.com> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ...and just saw Bryans note. Do we need more work before > > > > kicking > > > > > > > out > > > > > > > > > reg > > > > > > > > > > > release? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 7:42 PM Joe Witt < > > joe.w...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 100% same page as Andy. Mark said later this week he > > will > > > > have > > > > > > > some > > > > > > > > > > key > > > > > > > > > > > > bits wrapped. Lets see where we are then. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 7:22 PM Andy LoPresto < > > > > > > > alopre...@apache.org> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I understand everyone is anxious to get their hands on > > > the > > > > next > > > > > > > > > > release, > > > > > > > > > > > > > but this thread is exactly how we determine what will > > be > > > > in it. > > > > > > > > > There > > > > > > > > > > > is an > > > > > > > > > > > > > inherent balance in determining which features and > > fixes > > > > need > > > > > > to > > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > > > > > included to make the release worth it and which will > > > delay > > > > it, > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > this > > > > > > > > > > > > > requires being aware of a large percentage of the > > > > community’s > > > > > > > > > needs. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In addition, once a committer has volunteered as > > release > > > > > > manager > > > > > > > > > > (which > > > > > > > > > > > I > > > > > > > > > > > > > believe Joe has already done for this release), they > > set > > > > the > > > > > > pace > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > will > > > > > > > > > > > > > solicit feedback from the community here. So if Joe > > > replies > > > > > > that > > > > > > > he > > > > > > > > > > > wants > > > > > > > > > > > > > to perform the release process on Monday, any > > > non-critical > > > > > > > tickets > > > > > > > > > > (i.e. > > > > > > > > > > > > > features, non-security bug fixes, etc.) which are not > > > > merged > > > > > > will > > > > > > > > > not > > > > > > > > > > go > > > > > > > > > > > > > into 1.12.0. However, we often do wait to perform the > > > > release > > > > > > > > > process > > > > > > > > > > > until > > > > > > > > > > > > > specifically enumerated features are reviewed and > > merged > > > so > > > > > > they > > > > > > > > > can > > > > > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > > > > > included. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > One way to encourage the timely release of the next > > > > version is > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > offer > > > > > > > > > > > > > code reviews and other community activities where > > > possible, > > > > > > > because > > > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > > > > helps move everything forward. In the early days of > > > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > project, > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > user > > > > > > > > > > > > > base and the contributor base overlapped highly, and > > > > > > > > > > > > > it > > > was > > > > > > > easier > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > > solicit reviews on all contributions because the > > majority > > > > of > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > other > > > > > > > > > > > > > active people were also developers. Over the last 5 > > > years, > > > > both > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > contributor base and the user base have grown > > > > substantially, > > > > > > but > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > user > > > > > > > > > > > > > base has grown far faster than the contributor base. > > For > > > > this > > > > > > > > > reason, > > > > > > > > > > we > > > > > > > > > > > > > have many more people asking for features, releases, > > etc. > > > > than > > > > > > > can > > > > > > > > > > > > > contribute them. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Part of being a community is helping where possible, > > with > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > understanding that not everyone will have the time, > > > > expertise, > > > > > > or > > > > > > > > > > > desire to > > > > > > > > > > > > > do all tasks. But the most constructive way to speed > > the > > > > > > release > > > > > > > > > > > process is > > > > > > > > > > > > > for the outstanding tickets whose inclusion is > > determined > > > > to be > > > > > > > > > > > necessary > > > > > > > > > > > > > to be reviewed and merged. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Andy LoPresto > > > > > > > > > > > > > alopre...@apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > alopresto.apa...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > He/Him > > > > > > > > > > > > > PGP Fingerprint: 70EC B3E5 98A6 5A3F D3C4 BACE 3C6E > > F65B > > > > 2F7D > > > > > > > EF69 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 2, 2020, at 7:09 PM, Mike Thomsen < > > > > > > > mikerthom...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ** that's not to say I'll try to hold up a release > > vote > > > > over > > > > > > > it, > > > > > > > > > but > > > > > > > > > > > > > there > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is a good reason behind asking that it be included > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in > > > the > > > > > > last > > > > > > > > > round > > > > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > reviews. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 10:07 PM Mike Thomsen < > > > > > > > > > > mikerthom...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > #4217 is something I need because I'm planning to > > > build > > > > a > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cassandra-based > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > DistributedMapCache service for my client and > > > > contribute it > > > > > > > back > > > > > > > > > > once > > > > > > > > > > > > > we > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > determine that it's stable enough to give back. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 9:26 PM Martin Ebert < > > > > > > > > > martin.irg...@gmx.de> > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Mike, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I suggest we wrap this up and only include your > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > PRs > > > in > > > > > > > version > > > > > > > > > > 1.13 > > > > > > > > > > > > > Are > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > there any objections to release NiFi 1.12? We > > should > > > > not > > > > > > keep > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > community > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > waiting any longer. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mike Thomsen <mikerthom...@gmail.com> schrieb am > > > Mi., > > > > 10. > > > > > > > Juni > > > > > > > > > > > 2020, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 00:14: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I would like to refactor the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > OAuth2TokenProvider > > > > > > controller > > > > > > > > > > service > > > > > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > use > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the class that InvokeHttp now delegates to > > > > > > > > > > > > > (OkHttpClientBuilderUtils?) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > SSL configuration. I could get a pretty fast > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > turn > > > > around > > > > > > on > > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > > one. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Also, would like to see if we can get > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/4217 and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/4204 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > reviewed > > > and > > > > > > > merged. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The latter is a nice-to-have that can wait > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > until > > > 1.13 > > > > if > > > > > > > need > > > > > > > > > be. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 1:32 PM Mark Payne < > > > > > > > > > marka...@hotmail.com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Joe, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I do think there are a couple of things > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that I’d > > > > like to > > > > > > > see > > > > > > > > > > make > > > > > > > > > > > it > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > into > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1.12. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I worked on NIFI-7476 [1] and it’s been > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > merged to > > > > master. > > > > > > > > > But it > > > > > > > > > > > > > adds > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > couple of fields to the data model for > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Process > > > > Groups. So > > > > > > > > > that, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > unfortunately, means we need to update the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > data > > > > model in > > > > > > > NiFi > > > > > > > > > > > > > Registry > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [3] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and release that before releasing NiFi. > > Otherwise, > > > > those > > > > > > > > > changes > > > > > > > > > > > can > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > made in NiFi but when a group pushed to the > > > > registry, the > > > > > > > > > > changes > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > will be > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > lost. I’m working NIFIREG-398 now and should > > have a > > > > PR up > > > > > > > > > soon. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Also, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > related is NIFI-7509 [4], which I have a PR > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > up > > for. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am hoping to have all of this merged by > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > end of > > > the > > > > > > week. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Mark > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-7476 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [2] > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-7509 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [3] > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFIREG-398 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [4] > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-7509 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jun 9, 2020, at 1:25 PM, Andy LoPresto < > > > > > > > > > alopre...@apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <mailto: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > alopre...@apache.org>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks Joe. I could use a reviewer for [1], > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and > > I’m > > > > > > taking > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > > look > > > > > > > > > > > > > at a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > couple other things that have gone in > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > recently > > but > > > > should > > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > > ready > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > very > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > soon. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/4228 < > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/4228> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Andy LoPresto > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > alopre...@apache.org<mailto:alopre...@apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > alopresto.apa...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > He/Him > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > PGP Fingerprint: 70EC B3E5 98A6 5A3F D3C4 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > BACE > > > 3C6E > > > > F65B > > > > > > > > > 2F7D > > > > > > > > > > > EF69 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jun 9, 2020, at 10:21 AM, Joe Witt < > > > > > > joe.w...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Team, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Took me a bit longer than planned but am > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > back in > > > > position > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > help > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > drive a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1.12 release. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anything we're still trying to wrap we need > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to > > wait > > > > for? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 6:03 AM Joe Witt < > > > > > > > joe.w...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ok thanks for the heads up Bence > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 8:50 AM Simon Bence > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > < > > > > > > > > > > > > > simonbence....@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If the community decides to go on with > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1.11.5, I > > > > kindly > > > > > > ask > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > > include > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > NIFI-7292 in order to fix the issue > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > reported in > > > > > > NIFI-7454. > > > > > > > > > Thank > > > > > > > > > > > > > you! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-7454 > > < > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-7454> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-7292 > > < > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-7292> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bence > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 2020. May 18., at 16:18, Joe Witt < > > > > joe.w...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I will be unavailable to conduct release > > management > > > > now > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > > > > probably > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > next week or two. I'll come back to this > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thread > > > when > > > > > > able > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > dive > > > > > > > > > > > > > in. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 2:11 PM Joe Witt < > > > > > > > joe.w...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > K - sounds good. Will circle back in a few > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > days. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 1:56 PM Andy > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > LoPresto < > > > > > > > > > > > alopre...@apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for starting this thread Joe. I > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > agree the > > > > > > > > > back-pressure > > > > > > > > > > fix > > > > > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > one > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that will help the community a lot. I am > > currently > > > > > > working > > > > > > > > > on a > > > > > > > > > > > > > couple > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > security features which would also greatly > > benefit > > > > users. > > > > > > > I’d > > > > > > > > > > like > > > > > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > see > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > these get in 1.12.0 if possible, especially > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as > > > there > > > > are > > > > > > > some > > > > > > > > > > > > > changes > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > have already gone into master which I don’t > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > think > > > are > > > > > > ready > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > released > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and then required to be supported. Some are > > already > > > > up as > > > > > > > > > PRs. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My preferences, ranked: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1. Wait a few days on 1.12.0, release it > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with the > > > new > > > > > > > > > security > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > features > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and the back-pressure fix (along with the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > other > > > 170+) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2. Release 1.11.5 immediately for the > > back-pressure > > > > fix > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3. Release 1.12.0 immediately for the > > back-pressure > > > > fix > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > security > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > features have to wait for 1.13.0 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Andy LoPresto > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > alopre...@apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > alopresto.apa...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > He/Him > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > PGP Fingerprint: 70EC B3E5 98A6 5A3F D3C4 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > BACE > > > 3C6E > > > > F65B > > > > > > > > > 2F7D > > > > > > > > > > > EF69 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On May 13, 2020, at 10:52 AM, Joe Witt < > > > > > > joew...@apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Team, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A couple folks have recently reported > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > slowness in > > > > the UI > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > recent > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > releases particularly with larger and more > > > production > > > > > > style > > > > > > > > > > flows. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > appears to be related to when back pressure > > > > prediction is > > > > > > > > > > enabled > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1]. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It also appears this is already fixed [2] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and on > > > > > > > > > > 1.12.0-SNAPSHOT. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'd like to produce a release which captures > > this. > > > > It > > > > > > > isn't > > > > > > > > > > clear > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1.12 is ready to roll but happy to look > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > into that > > > > path if > > > > > > > so. > > > > > > > > > > > There > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > already 177+ closed JIRAs on that thing!! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Alternatively if easier I could kick out > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > another > > on > > > > 1.11 > > > > > > > > > which > > > > > > > > > > > would > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1.11.5 and go looking opportunistically for > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > other > > > > bits to > > > > > > > > > grab > > > > > > > > > > as > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > well. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any thoughts? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-7437 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [2] > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-7087 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Joe > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
