Hello

Just an update on push to 1.12 release.  There have been a few items pop up
that require resolution.  Keeping a close eye on these and will initiate
the RC once we are looking stable.

You can follow along and participate where appropriate by watching
https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/NIFI/versions/12346778

Thanks

On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 1:55 PM Joey Frazee <joey.fra...@icloud.com.invalid>
wrote:

> I need to double check whether it needs rebased but there’s a docs PR for
> how to enable client TLS for ZooKeeper that I think would be good to
> include until the more integrated work is done:
>
> https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/4092
>
> Would anyone have time to look?
>
> -joey
> On Aug 3, 2020, 11:47 AM -0700, Joe Witt <joe.w...@gmail.com>, wrote:
> > ok cool. will keep an eye there once the other items land.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 11:26 AM Bryan Bende <bbe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I was doing some testing and noticed some framework level classes like
> > > prioritizers and authorizers were getting class not found exceptions.
> > >
> > > I believe it is related to the module/classpath changes we made as
> part of
> > > NIFI-7592 [1], so we should hold on the RC until we can resolve that.
> > >
> > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-7592
> > >
> > > On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 12:51 PM Joe Witt <joe.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Mike,
> > > >
> > > > 7526 merged this weekend.
> > > > 7605 sounds like LoPresto is going to look at.
> > > >
> > > > There are a couple others (kafka 2.5 and smb stuff i'd like to get in
> > > > before I kick out the RC). Hopefully I can start that today.
> > > >
> > > > It is definitely time for 1.12!
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 3:13 PM Mike Thomsen <mikerthom...@gmail.com
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > 7605 is the PR for the user agent discussion and 7526 is a small
> SSL
> > > > > refactor for the OAuth2TokenProvider that needs to be reviewed (as
> > > > > OAuth2TokenProvider is already part of master).
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > >
> > > > > Mike
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 12:14 PM Joe Witt <joe.w...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ...ok looking like NiFi 1.12 is pretty well in hand. I plan early
> > > next
> > > > > > week to start pulling the release together.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 6:39 AM Pierre Villard <
> > > > > pierre.villard...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Sounds good to me. Happy to take care of the RC duties for
> another
> > > > > release
> > > > > > > once the OIDC work is available.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Le mar. 14 juil. 2020 à 21:31, Bryan Bende <bbe...@gmail.com>
> a
> > > > écrit
> > > > > :
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Spoke with Nathan again and there is still more work to do
> for
> > > OIDC
> > > > > in
> > > > > > > > registry.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > If no one objects, I'll work on kicking out an RC for 0.7.0
> > > > tomorrow
> > > > > > > > morning, and we can land OIDC for the next release, likely an
> > > > 0.8.0.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 8:48 AM Bryan Bende <bbe...@gmail.com
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I can be RM for an 0.7.0 registry release.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I spoke with Nathan and he has been making progress on the
> OIDC
> > > > > > > support,
> > > > > > > > > so I will wait a little bit to see if we can get that in,
> but
> > > if
> > > > it
> > > > > > > > starts
> > > > > > > > > taking longer then I'll proceed with getting an RC out.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 5:41 AM Pierre Villard <
> > > > > > > > pierre.villard...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Regarding the NiFi Registry 0.7.0 release - if we can
> have the
> > > > > OIDC
> > > > > > > > > > support
> > > > > > > > > > in it, that would be great. I know Nathan is working on
> it
> > > > (based
> > > > > on
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > JIRA) not sure if this is something close to being ready.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Le sam. 4 juil. 2020 à 21:15, Mike Thomsen <
> > > > > mikerthom...@gmail.com> a
> > > > > > > > > > écrit :
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > FYI, if we add in
> https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/4364
> > > > and
> > > > > a PR
> > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > deprecate the elasticsearch v5 bundle we can free up
> about
> > > > 60MB
> > > > > in
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > convenience binary.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 10:43 PM Joe Witt <
> > > joe.w...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > ...and just saw Bryans note. Do we need more work
> before
> > > > > kicking
> > > > > > > > out
> > > > > > > > > > reg
> > > > > > > > > > > > release?
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 7:42 PM Joe Witt <
> > > joe.w...@gmail.com
> > > > >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 100% same page as Andy. Mark said later this week
> he
> > > will
> > > > > have
> > > > > > > > some
> > > > > > > > > > > key
> > > > > > > > > > > > > bits wrapped. Lets see where we are then.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 7:22 PM Andy LoPresto <
> > > > > > > > alopre...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I understand everyone is anxious to get their
> hands on
> > > > the
> > > > > next
> > > > > > > > > > > release,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > but this thread is exactly how we determine what
> will
> > > be
> > > > > in it.
> > > > > > > > > > There
> > > > > > > > > > > > is an
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > inherent balance in determining which features
> and
> > > fixes
> > > > > need
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > included to make the release worth it and which
> will
> > > > delay
> > > > > it,
> > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > requires being aware of a large percentage of the
> > > > > community’s
> > > > > > > > > > needs.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > In addition, once a committer has volunteered as
> > > release
> > > > > > > manager
> > > > > > > > > > > (which
> > > > > > > > > > > > I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > believe Joe has already done for this release),
> they
> > > set
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > pace
> > > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > > will
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > solicit feedback from the community here. So if
> Joe
> > > > replies
> > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > > he
> > > > > > > > > > > > wants
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > to perform the release process on Monday, any
> > > > non-critical
> > > > > > > > tickets
> > > > > > > > > > > (i.e.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > features, non-security bug fixes, etc.) which
> are not
> > > > > merged
> > > > > > > will
> > > > > > > > > > not
> > > > > > > > > > > go
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > into 1.12.0. However, we often do wait to
> perform the
> > > > > release
> > > > > > > > > > process
> > > > > > > > > > > > until
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > specifically enumerated features are reviewed and
> > > merged
> > > > so
> > > > > > > they
> > > > > > > > > > can
> > > > > > > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > included.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > One way to encourage the timely release of the
> next
> > > > > version is
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > offer
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > code reviews and other community activities where
> > > > possible,
> > > > > > > > because
> > > > > > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > helps move everything forward. In the early days
> of the
> > > > > > > project,
> > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > user
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > base and the contributor base overlapped highly,
> and it
> > > > was
> > > > > > > > easier
> > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > solicit reviews on all contributions because the
> > > majority
> > > > > of
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > other
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > active people were also developers. Over the
> last 5
> > > > years,
> > > > > both
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > contributor base and the user base have grown
> > > > > substantially,
> > > > > > > but
> > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > user
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > base has grown far faster than the contributor
> base.
> > > For
> > > > > this
> > > > > > > > > > reason,
> > > > > > > > > > > we
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > have many more people asking for features,
> releases,
> > > etc.
> > > > > than
> > > > > > > > can
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > contribute them.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Part of being a community is helping where
> possible,
> > > with
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > understanding that not everyone will have the
> time,
> > > > > expertise,
> > > > > > > or
> > > > > > > > > > > > desire to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > do all tasks. But the most constructive way to
> speed
> > > the
> > > > > > > release
> > > > > > > > > > > > process is
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > for the outstanding tickets whose inclusion is
> > > determined
> > > > > to be
> > > > > > > > > > > > necessary
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > to be reviewed and merged.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Andy LoPresto
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > alopre...@apache.org
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > alopresto.apa...@gmail.com
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > He/Him
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > PGP Fingerprint: 70EC B3E5 98A6 5A3F D3C4 BACE
> 3C6E
> > > F65B
> > > > > 2F7D
> > > > > > > > EF69
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 2, 2020, at 7:09 PM, Mike Thomsen <
> > > > > > > > mikerthom...@gmail.com
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ** that's not to say I'll try to hold up a
> release
> > > vote
> > > > > over
> > > > > > > > it,
> > > > > > > > > > but
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > there
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is a good reason behind asking that it be
> included in
> > > > the
> > > > > > > last
> > > > > > > > > > round
> > > > > > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > reviews.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 10:07 PM Mike Thomsen <
> > > > > > > > > > > mikerthom...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > #4217 is something I need because I'm
> planning to
> > > > build
> > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cassandra-based
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > DistributedMapCache service for my client and
> > > > > contribute it
> > > > > > > > back
> > > > > > > > > > > once
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > we
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > determine that it's stable enough to give
> back.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 9:26 PM Martin Ebert <
> > > > > > > > > > martin.irg...@gmx.de>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Mike,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I suggest we wrap this up and only include
> your PRs
> > > > in
> > > > > > > > version
> > > > > > > > > > > 1.13
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Are
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > there any objections to release NiFi 1.12?
> We
> > > should
> > > > > not
> > > > > > > keep
> > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > community
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > waiting any longer.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mike Thomsen <mikerthom...@gmail.com>
> schrieb am
> > > > Mi.,
> > > > > 10.
> > > > > > > > Juni
> > > > > > > > > > > > 2020,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 00:14:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I would like to refactor the
> OAuth2TokenProvider
> > > > > > > controller
> > > > > > > > > > > service
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > use
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the class that InvokeHttp now delegates
> to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > (OkHttpClientBuilderUtils?)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > SSL configuration. I could get a pretty
> fast turn
> > > > > around
> > > > > > > on
> > > > > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > > > > > > one.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Also, would like to see if we can get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/4217
> and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/4204
> reviewed
> > > > and
> > > > > > > > merged.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The latter is a nice-to-have that can
> wait until
> > > > 1.13
> > > > > if
> > > > > > > > need
> > > > > > > > > > be.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 1:32 PM Mark
> Payne <
> > > > > > > > > > marka...@hotmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Joe,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I do think there are a couple of
> things that I’d
> > > > > like to
> > > > > > > > see
> > > > > > > > > > > make
> > > > > > > > > > > > it
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > into
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1.12.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I worked on NIFI-7476 [1] and it’s
> been merged to
> > > > > master.
> > > > > > > > > > But it
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > adds
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > couple of fields to the data model for
> Process
> > > > > Groups. So
> > > > > > > > > > that,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > unfortunately, means we need to update
> the data
> > > > > model in
> > > > > > > > NiFi
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Registry
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [3]
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and release that before releasing NiFi.
> > > Otherwise,
> > > > > those
> > > > > > > > > > changes
> > > > > > > > > > > > can
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > made in NiFi but when a group pushed
> to the
> > > > > registry, the
> > > > > > > > > > > changes
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > will be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > lost. I’m working NIFIREG-398 now and
> should
> > > have a
> > > > > PR up
> > > > > > > > > > soon.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Also,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > related is NIFI-7509 [4], which I have
> a PR up
> > > for.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am hoping to have all of this merged
> by end of
> > > > the
> > > > > > > week.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Mark
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1]
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-7476
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [2]
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-7509
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [3]
> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFIREG-398
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [4]
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-7509
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jun 9, 2020, at 1:25 PM, Andy
> LoPresto <
> > > > > > > > > > alopre...@apache.org
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <mailto:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > alopre...@apache.org>> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks Joe. I could use a reviewer for
> [1], and
> > > I’m
> > > > > > > taking
> > > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > > > look
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > at a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > couple other things that have gone in
> recently
> > > but
> > > > > should
> > > > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > > > ready
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > very
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > soon.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1]
> https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/4228 <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/4228>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Andy LoPresto
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > alopre...@apache.org<mailto:
> alopre...@apache.org
> > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > alopresto.apa...@gmail.com
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > He/Him
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > PGP Fingerprint: 70EC B3E5 98A6 5A3F
> D3C4 BACE
> > > > 3C6E
> > > > > F65B
> > > > > > > > > > 2F7D
> > > > > > > > > > > > EF69
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jun 9, 2020, at 10:21 AM, Joe Witt <
> > > > > > > joe.w...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Team,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Took me a bit longer than planned but
> am back in
> > > > > position
> > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > help
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > drive a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1.12 release.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anything we're still trying to wrap we
> need to
> > > wait
> > > > > for?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 6:03 AM Joe
> Witt <
> > > > > > > > joe.w...@gmail.com
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ok thanks for the heads up Bence
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 8:50 AM Simon
> Bence <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > simonbence....@gmail.com
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If the community decides to go on with
> 1.11.5, I
> > > > > kindly
> > > > > > > ask
> > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > include
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > NIFI-7292 in order to fix the issue
> reported in
> > > > > > > NIFI-7454.
> > > > > > > > > > Thank
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > you!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-7454
> > > <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-7454>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-7292
> > > <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-7292>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bence
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 2020. May 18., at 16:18, Joe Witt <
> > > > > joe.w...@gmail.com
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I will be unavailable to conduct
> release
> > > management
> > > > > now
> > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > > > > > probably
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > next week or two. I'll come back to
> this thread
> > > > when
> > > > > > > able
> > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > dive
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > in.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 2:11 PM Joe
> Witt <
> > > > > > > > joe.w...@gmail.com
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > K - sounds good. Will circle back in a
> few days.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 1:56 PM Andy
> LoPresto <
> > > > > > > > > > > > alopre...@apache.org
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for starting this thread Joe. I
> agree the
> > > > > > > > > > back-pressure
> > > > > > > > > > > fix
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > is
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > one
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that will help the community a lot. I
> am
> > > currently
> > > > > > > working
> > > > > > > > > > on a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > couple
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > security features which would also
> greatly
> > > benefit
> > > > > users.
> > > > > > > > I’d
> > > > > > > > > > > like
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > see
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > these get in 1.12.0 if possible,
> especially as
> > > > there
> > > > > are
> > > > > > > > some
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > changes
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > have already gone into master which I
> don’t think
> > > > are
> > > > > > > ready
> > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > released
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and then required to be supported.
> Some are
> > > already
> > > > > up as
> > > > > > > > > > PRs.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My preferences, ranked:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1. Wait a few days on 1.12.0, release
> it with the
> > > > new
> > > > > > > > > > security
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > features
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and the back-pressure fix (along with
> the other
> > > > 170+)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2. Release 1.11.5 immediately for the
> > > back-pressure
> > > > > fix
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3. Release 1.12.0 immediately for the
> > > back-pressure
> > > > > fix
> > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > security
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > features have to wait for 1.13.0
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Andy LoPresto
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > alopre...@apache.org
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > alopresto.apa...@gmail.com
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > He/Him
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > PGP Fingerprint: 70EC B3E5 98A6 5A3F
> D3C4 BACE
> > > > 3C6E
> > > > > F65B
> > > > > > > > > > 2F7D
> > > > > > > > > > > > EF69
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On May 13, 2020, at 10:52 AM, Joe Witt
> <
> > > > > > > joew...@apache.org
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Team,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A couple folks have recently reported
> slowness in
> > > > > the UI
> > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > recent
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > releases particularly with larger and
> more
> > > > production
> > > > > > > style
> > > > > > > > > > > flows.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > appears to be related to when back
> pressure
> > > > > prediction is
> > > > > > > > > > > enabled
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1].
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It also appears this is already fixed
> [2] and on
> > > > > > > > > > > 1.12.0-SNAPSHOT.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'd like to produce a release which
> captures
> > > this.
> > > > > It
> > > > > > > > isn't
> > > > > > > > > > > clear
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1.12 is ready to roll but happy to
> look into that
> > > > > path if
> > > > > > > > so.
> > > > > > > > > > > > There
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > are
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > already 177+ closed JIRAs on that
> thing!!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Alternatively if easier I could kick
> out another
> > > on
> > > > > 1.11
> > > > > > > > > > which
> > > > > > > > > > > > would
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1.11.5 and go looking
> opportunistically for other
> > > > > bits to
> > > > > > > > > > grab
> > > > > > > > > > > as
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > well.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any thoughts?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1]
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-7437
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [2]
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-7087
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Joe
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
>

Reply via email to