Team

Going to try to pull the rc together today.  Havent looked at what remains
but it is time.  Will look at what is hanging out/mergable and get after
it.

Thanks

On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 8:45 AM Nathan Gough <thena...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Joe Gresock just pinged me about an issue that may have been introduced by
> a dependency upgrade I did for lucene:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-8699 which appears to cause an
> issue for existing provenance repositories. I tested the upgrade on a fresh
> install so I didn't notice the issue. There appears to be a way to add a
> backwards codec which should allow the new lucene to keep working with the
> existing provenance repo. Looking into reproducing and a fix for it now.
>
> On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 9:06 AM Mark Bean <mark.o.b...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Putting out one more request for the following open PR's before 1.14
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/5094
> > https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/5061
> >
> > Both have been reviewed, but still need attention from a comitter.
> >
> > Thanks!
> > -Mark
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 12:17 PM Joe Witt <joe.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Team,
> > >
> > > I'll start pulling 1.14 together more this week as time permits.  As
> > > far as specific commits/etc.. please work with reviewers/etc.. to help
> > > nail that down.  If anything doesn't make it in when I initiate the RC
> > > line then we'll get it on the next one.  There is a shocking amount of
> > > goodness in here already.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > On Sun, Jun 13, 2021 at 2:27 PM Chris Sampson
> > > <chris.samp...@naimuri.com.invalid> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Joe,
> > > >
> > > > Yeah I thought it would be something like that (but didn't spend time
> > > > looking at the moment, just thought I'd highlight the thread). Don't
> > know
> > > > whether there's anything to consider adding to/clarifying in the
> > > > documentation in order to highlight that to (first time) users?
> > > >
> > > > Again, I figured this would probably be "as designed" and I've not
> > spent
> > > > the time reading the docs for this new default behaviour - so long as
> > it
> > > > should be clear to first time users (provided they read the docs),
> then
> > > all
> > > > good.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > >
> > > > Chris Sampson
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, 13 Jun 2021, 21:42 Joe Witt, <joe.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Chris
> > > > >
> > > > > I responded to the slack thread. Pretty sure it is doing exactly
> what
> > > > > is expected.  We are not offering a user management and policy
> > > > > authoring experience for that.  It is quite literally 'single user
> > > > > auth' and in that mode this single user we generate has all the
> > > > > authorizations.  This is functionally equivalent to how it was with
> > an
> > > > > unsecured instance with what is basically 'anonymous' user except
> in
> > > > > this case it is TLS and requires the known single user credentials.
> > > > > For real usage, just as before, users need to take advantage of one
> > of
> > > > > the other existing authentication and authorization plugin options.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sun, Jun 13, 2021 at 11:26 AM Chris Sampson
> > > > > <chris.samp...@naimuri.com.invalid> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > FYI, there's a new thread in slack about the new
> > > single-user-authoriser
> > > > > > setup - user has https but no users/policy screen for setting up
> > > AuthZ.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Might be worth someone taking a look before an RC to see whether
> > > there's
> > > > > > documentation (or functionality) that needs clarifying.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Chris Sampson
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Sun, 13 Jun 2021, 13:57 Mark Bean, <mark.o.b...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > There are three open PR's I would appreciate some eyes on
> before
> > > the RC
> > > > > > > process is kicked off. Two of the three have been reviewed, but
> > not
> > > > > yet by
> > > > > > > a committer.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/5094
> > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/5061
> > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/5064
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks in advance!
> > > > > > > -Mark
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 4:05 PM Joe Witt <joe.w...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > So. Dang. Cool.  I just built from latest main and poof - I'm
> > on
> > > > > https
> > > > > > > > with username/password.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Will start whipping up the process for an RC.  Probably will
> > be a
> > > > > > > > little slow going with dayjob factors but will get on it.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 12:14 PM David Handermann
> > > > > > > > <exceptionfact...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thanks to Mark Payne, NIFI-8516 is now merged, so that
> covers
> > > > > current
> > > > > > > > open
> > > > > > > > > issues around securing the default configuration.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > > David Handermann
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 11:55 AM David Handermann <
> > > > > > > > > exceptionfact...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Joe,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Thanks for following up.  The PR for NIFI-8516 has gone
> > > through
> > > > > > > several
> > > > > > > > > > rounds of feedback, I believe it is about ready to go,
> > > pending
> > > > > > > > confirmation
> > > > > > > > > > that the ability to set custom credentials addresses the
> > > ease of
> > > > > use
> > > > > > > > > > concern.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > > > David Handermann
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 11:41 AM Joe Witt <
> > > joe.w...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >> David,
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >> Ok thanks - do you have a sense of when what you see as
> > good
> > > > > 1.14
> > > > > > > > > >> specific work will be merged?  Do you have the
> > > > > reviewers/engagement
> > > > > > > > > >> you need?
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >> This 1.14 is already pretty packed but definitely agree
> we
> > > need
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > >> make real progress on secure by default and this release
> > is
> > > a
> > > > > great
> > > > > > > > > >> time to take the first big step.
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >> Thanks
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >> On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 5:52 AM David Handermann
> > > > > > > > > >> <exceptionfact...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > > >> > Thanks for kicking off the discussion Joe!
> > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > > >> > Of the many items that could be included in the next
> > > release,
> > > > > > > > securing
> > > > > > > > > >> the
> > > > > > > > > >> > default configuration as described in NIFI-8220
> > > > > > > > > >> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-8220>
> would
> > > be
> > > > > great
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > >> have
> > > > > > > > > >> > completed.  Most of the elements are in place, and the
> > > current
> > > > > > > Pull
> > > > > > > > > >> Request
> > > > > > > > > >> > for NIFI-8516 <
> https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/5068
> > >
> > > is
> > > > > under
> > > > > > > > > >> review.
> > > > > > > > > >> > If there are any other achievable items that should be
> > > > > included as
> > > > > > > > part
> > > > > > > > > >> of
> > > > > > > > > >> > a secure default installation for NiFi, it would be
> > > helpful
> > > > > to add
> > > > > > > > > >> > sub-tasks to NIFI-8220.  The current scope is limited
> > to a
> > > > > > > > standalone
> > > > > > > > > >> > installation, so issues regarding clustered
> deployments
> > > can be
> > > > > > > > handled
> > > > > > > > > >> > separately.  If others are interested in evaluating
> the
> > > > > proposed
> > > > > > > new
> > > > > > > > > >> > default configuration that requires HTTPS and
> leverages
> > a
> > > > > > > generated
> > > > > > > > > >> > username and password, feel free to provide feedback
> on
> > > > > NIFI-8516.
> > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > > >> > Regards,
> > > > > > > > > >> > David Handermann
> > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > > >> > On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 6:51 PM Otto Fowler <
> > > > > > > > ottobackwa...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > > >> > > I think NIFI-8625 and NIFI-8461 need to be
> understood
> > > and
> > > > > > > > addressed.
> > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > >> > > > On May 27, 2021, at 13:29, Joe Witt <
> > > joe.w...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > > > > >> > > > Team,
> > > > > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > > > > >> > > > There has been a tremendous amount of work already
> > on
> > > the
> > > > > 1.14
> > > > > > > > line
> > > > > > > > > >> as
> > > > > > > > > >> > > shown:
> > > > > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/NIFI/versions/12349644
> > > > > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > > > > >> > > > These include merging the nifi registry and minifi
> > > java
> > > > > into
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > >> nifi
> > > > > > > > > >> > > > line itself.  So when we release these things stay
> > in
> > > > > sync and
> > > > > > > > > >> > > > maintained.  The release will now produce things
> > like
> > > > > Apache
> > > > > > > > NiFi,
> > > > > > > > > >> the
> > > > > > > > > >> > > > Apache NiFi toolkit, Apache NiFi Registry, and
> > Apache
> > > NiFi
> > > > > > > > MiNiFi
> > > > > > > > > >> Java
> > > > > > > > > >> > > > and the Apache NiFi stateless runtime as well.
> > There
> > > have
> > > > > > > been
> > > > > > > > many
> > > > > > > > > >> > > > improvements to core nifi and stateless nifi now
> > > meaning
> > > > > we
> > > > > > > > have the
> > > > > > > > > >> > > > traditional execution form factor and this new
> > > stateless
> > > > > mode.
> > > > > > > > We
> > > > > > > > > >> can
> > > > > > > > > >> > > > now hot load nars from HDFS storage locations
> which
> > > could
> > > > > mean
> > > > > > > > HDFS,
> > > > > > > > > >> > > > blob storage in the cloud, etc..  There is a lot
> > more.
> > > > > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > > > > >> > > > Anyway, I wanted to start circling the wagons for
> a
> > > 1.14
> > > > > > > > release.
> > > > > > > > > >> I'm
> > > > > > > > > >> > > > happy to take on RM duties especially since there
> > > will be
> > > > > new
> > > > > > > > > >> elements
> > > > > > > > > >> > > > to the release process.
> > > > > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > > > > >> > > > Thanks
> > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to