Joe, I don’t know if we can make the case for a stand alone processor for doing this on top of that, if so, I’d be willing to take a look at that.
From: Otto Fowler <ottobackwa...@gmail.com> Reply: Otto Fowler <ottobackwa...@gmail.com> Date: March 19, 2022 at 13:40:07 To: dev@nifi.apache.org <dev@nifi.apache.org>, Phil H <gippyp...@gmail.com> Subject: Re: SplitContent doesn’t support regex? In the Apache Metron Project (in the attic now) we used https://github.com/nishihatapalmer/byteseek to do pcap searches, maybe you can check that out. From: Phil H <gippyp...@gmail.com> Reply: dev@nifi.apache.org <dev@nifi.apache.org> Date: March 16, 2022 at 20:04:58 To: dev@nifi.apache.org <dev@nifi.apache.org> Subject: Re: SplitContent doesn’t support regex? I dunno about a good implementation… I did a similar extension of GetTCP to allow for a regex EOM rather than a single byte. It works, but I don’t feel like it was done in the spirit of the existing processor! On Thu, 17 Mar 2022 at 09:12, Joe Witt <joe.w...@gmail.com> wrote: > Phil > > I'd say if you have a good implementation in mind you should go for it. > Sounds interesting. > > Thanks > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 3:59 PM Phil H <gippyp...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > This seems like an odd omission - aside from performance (presumably?) is > > there a reason why there isn’t a regex option for the byte sequence? I > need > > one but thought I’d ask before I built my own. > > > > Thanks > > Phil > > >
