+1, seems like a good time for a new release, thanks for RM-ing

On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 4:07 PM Kevin Doran <kdo...@apache.org> wrote:

>  +1 from me, it seems like a good time for the next release of MiNiFi C++
>
> On Apr 3, 2023 at 07:34:44, Gábor Gyimesi <gamezb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi community,
> >
> > I'd like to initiate a discussion about the next release of MiNiFi C++.
> The
> > last release was almost four months ago, and there have been many new
> > features,
> > bug fixes and stability improvements committed to the development branch
> > since then: 74 tickets closed, over 80 commits as of today.
> >
> > I would be happy to take on RM duties for this release.
> >
> > Notable features and improvements since the 0.14.0 release:
> >
> > - Several improvements on repository resource handling
> >  * Periodically run RocksDB repository compaction+1
> >  * Add compression options for RocksDB repositories
> >  * Add synchronous flow file reloading
> >  * Retry failed removals of unused resources
> > - Use Python stable ABI to support all libraries above Python 3.2+ for
> > Python processors
> > - Add ProcessSession::remove to Python and Lua API
> > - Add support for JSON flow configuration format with option to generate
> > JSON schema locally
> > - Add support for reverseDnsLookup in expression language
> > - Fix most issues for ARM64 support
> > - Improve performance of ListFile processor
> > - Add cache SID lookups in ConsumeWindowsEventLog processor
> > - Add default connection size limits of 2000 queue size and 100MB of
> queue
> > data size
> > - Add support for MQTT 5 (mistakenly advertised for 0.13.0 release)
> > - Add failure relationship to SQL processors
> > - Add support for new AWS regions
> > - Add option to select processor metrics with regular expressions
> > - Add the UUID to the end of Processor and Controller Service log lines
> > - Make GetFile path attributes consistent with other processors
> > - Fix leaks and file lock issues on Windows
> > - Fix crashing in python processors
> >
> > The core API is still not mature enough to be able to commit to it, so
> > in line with previous discussions I suggest releasing it as 0.14.0.
> >
> > Do you agree it is time for a new release? Are there any blockers that we
> > should definitely include in this release?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Gabor
> >
>

Reply via email to