Given that the flow analysis rules are something specific to NiFi 2, and given that this is an opportunity to do some house cleaning, I'll go directly to a 2.0.0 release directly and have it used only on the main branch. The things that have been added as improvements are not really required for 1.x anyway.
Le mar. 21 mai 2024 à 15:40, David Handermann <exceptionfact...@apache.org> a écrit : > Thanks Pierre, sounds good! > > Regards, > David Handermann > > On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 8:36 AM Pierre Villard > <pierre.villard...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Thanks will go ahead with 1.6.0 release process > > > > Le lun. 20 mai 2024 à 19:30, Matt Burgess <mattyb...@gmail.com> a écrit > : > > > > > +1 for a 1.6.0 release > > > > > > On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 1:25 PM Bryan Bende <bbe...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Thanks Pierre. I agree it would be good to kick out a release. I > would > > > > lean towards 1.6.0 since the commits seem to be improvements rather > > > > than bug fixes for a patch. > > > > > > > > On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 1:08 PM Pierre Villard > > > > <pierre.villard...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > We just merged a couple of improvements for the NiFi NAR Maven > Plugin > > > and > > > > > another improvement has been merged some time ago for which the > > > community > > > > > expressed interest [1]. I think it could be a good time to release > a > > > new > > > > > version, either as 1.5.2 or as 1.6.0. Once we have a new release, > there > > > > > will be a need for updating the NiFi code base and I have a PR > ready > > > for > > > > > that [2]. > > > > > > > > > > I'm happy to help with the release process. > > > > > > > > > > Do you agree it is time for a new release or do you see additional > > > > changes > > > > > we should make? > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Pierre > > > > > > > > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/nifi-maven/pull/35 > > > > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-13267 > > > > > > > >
