So far as I know this particular issue is well in hand. The big help would be whatever other issues our use turns up. :)
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote: > Sean > > Sorry meant to reply two days ago. My own preference is to wait until the > kinks are ironed out unless current use of the workaround helps with the > ironing out of those kinks. > > Do you need that help or have it in hand? > > Thanks > Joe > On May 21, 2015 11:50 AM, "Sean Busbey" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > bump? > > > > On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Sean Busbey <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > Heya folks! > > > > > > Last week I worked through using the Hadoop Precommit Patch Tester to > > > evaluate NiFi patches[1]. > > > > > > Most of the edges have been sanded down. There is still one outstanding > > > major change that's needed to deal with NiFi's multi-project repo > layout > > > [2]. That fix is more involved, because it's providing a major boost in > > the > > > flexibility of the precommit framework (yay!) so I'm not sure when it's > > > going to land. > > > > > > I have a work around for that particular issue for the specifics of > > NiFi's > > > layout[3]. However, it is definitely not what will be in the version > that > > > is committed and the way NiFi hooks into the test framework will be > > > different once things settle. > > > > > > Would folks prefer to wait for the fix before using the precommit > tester > > > or run on top of my workaround for now (changing once the fix lands)? > > > > > > > > > [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-577 > > > > > > [2]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11929 > > > > > > [3]: https://github.com/busbey/hadoop/commits/NIFI-577 > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Sean > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Sean > > > -- Sean
