Hi Lewis, 2.1 is fine with me. This is assuming 2.x is a good naming scheme in the first place. I must say that since the move of Nutchgora from trunk to branch it's kind of odd that it's still referred to as 2.x. (For now that's okay I guess).
Ferdy On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Lewis John Mcgibbney < lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Good Morning, > > Does anyone have a differing opinion on naming next development track for > Nutchgora branch 2.1? > > Before I set and classify most issues it would be good to know. > > Thank you > > Lewis > > -- > *Lewis* > >
