Hi Julien, Do you suggest with the binary release that we simply open up all gora-* deps and ship it with every jar available?
Lewis On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 9:39 PM, Julien Nioche < lists.digitalpeb...@gmail.com> wrote: > I disagree. You'd expect a binary release to work out of the box - which > is not the case. Plus we'd have to spend more time explaining the > workaround, answering the same questions over and over on the ML etc... > Fixing this should not be a big deal (i.e. add the gore-x modules for the > backends to the ivy deps file). > > Julien > > > On 14 June 2012 20:27, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) < > chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote: > >> Hey Guys, >> >> I think the annoyance is probably something folks can live with as they >> have been >> waiting for an "official" release of 2.x for years :) >> >> My +1 to roll RC #2 with or without a solution to this and mark it as a >> TODO. "release >> eary", "release often" :) >> >> Cheers, >> Chris >> >> On Jun 14, 2012, at 10:04 AM, Lewis John Mcgibbney wrote: >> >> > Aye this is no good at all. Depending on which backend you wish to use >> with Gora, you will need to go and manually fetch the correct .jar's from >> maven central. >> > >> > Does anyone else have either solution or a workaround before I push RC2 >> with just src dists? >> > >> > Thanks >> > >> > Lewis >> > >> > On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Sebastian Nagel < >> wastl.na...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> > > We only supply src distributions... >> > > Does this principle apply to Nutch 2 as well? >> > Maybe, yes. >> > The situation with the current binary package is uncomfortable: >> > I had to copy/link gora-hbase and hbase jars into lib/ to get nutch >> running. >> > >> > 2012/6/13 Lewis John Mcgibbney <lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com> >> > Hi Guys, >> > >> > Whilst updating the Nutch2Tutorial I got thinking that within Gora we >> don't supply binary distributions of the code, this is because when using >> Gora a user may wish/require to recompile the code to accomodate config >> changes etc. We only supply src distributions... >> > >> > Does this principle apply to Nutch 2 as well? I mean, what if your >> using the gora-sql dependency, then you wish to switch to HBase and >> recompile, is this possible within the binary distribution? >> > >> > Best >> > >> > Lewis >> > >> > >> > On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Julien Nioche < >> lists.digitalpeb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Ferdy >> > >> > The Nutch job jar is not present in the binary archive. This means >> distributed running of jobs is not supported. I'm not sure if this is a >> problem (since users can always build one themselves), merely pointing it >> out. The recently released 1.5 also lacks this job jar, so at least no >> difference there. >> > >> > The binary distrib corresponds to runtime/local and as such should NOT >> have the job file there. This is now the norm since 1.5 >> > >> > Will try and do some testing of the RC >> > >> > Thanks >> > >> > Julien >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > >> > Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering >> > >> > http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/ >> > http://www.digitalpebble.com >> > http://twitter.com/digitalpebble >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Lewis >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Lewis >> > >> >> >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. >> Senior Computer Scientist >> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA >> Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 >> Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov >> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department >> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> >> > > > -- > * > * > Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering > > http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/ > http://www.digitalpebble.com > http://twitter.com/digitalpebble > > -- *Lewis*
