-----Original Message----- From: Gregory Nutt [mailto:spudan...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, December 20, 2019 2:02 PM To: dev@nuttx.apache.org Subject: Re: Testing the new repository
>> We you can see the new repository is working fine. >> >> I submitted the i2C driver for STM32G070/NUCLEO-G070RB that was added >> to bitbucket. >> >> As a rules of thumb, please don't commit directly to the "master". +1 We should ask if info can branch protected master (settings panel in GH), but I have no idea how or if that will work the ASF cross sync. >> >> I created a brash called "stage" that we could use before merging in >> to "master", this way other will have the chance to review. >That seems like a good sense. Except aren't you creating a workflow >definition from thin air. I suppose that is natural in a vaccum -- even >thin air is more substantial than a vacuum -- but we really need to >define such rules in a workflow requirements document. In an a attempt to fill the vaccum - A skeleton [CALL for TOP Down workflow Requirements] has been posted Please help update and integrate what you want from the previous discussion
