Turned on DEBUG_ASSERTIONS, DEBUG_NET_ERROR=y, DEBUG_NET_INFO=y,
DEBUG_NET_WARN=y, left only WakeWithSignal test in usrsocktest example, got
hardfault in debug assertion somewhere in semaphores
nsh> Starting unit-tests...
Testing group "WakeWithSignal" =>
usrsockdev_open: opening /dev/usrsock
usrsockdev_pollnotify: Report events: 01
usrsock_event: events: 8000
socket_event: request completed.
usrsockdev_pollnotify: Report events: 01
usrsockdev_close: closing /dev/usrsock
usrsock_event: events: 0002
connect_event: socket aborted.
usrsock_close: usockid=10000; already closed.
usrsockdev_open: opening /dev/usrsock
usrsockdev_pollnotify: Report events: 01
usrsock_event: events: 8000
socket_event: request completed.
usrsockdev_pollnotify: Report events: 01
usrsock_event: events: 8000
socket_event: request completed.
usrsockdev_pollnotify: Report events: 01
usrsock_event: events: 8000
socket_event: request completed.
usrsockdev_pollnotify: Report events: 01
usrsock_event: events: 8000
socket_evenup_assert: Assertion failed at file:semaphore/sem_holder.c line:
128 task: usrsocktest
on attempt blocking connect
do_usrsock_blocking_close_thread:
/* Attempt blocking connect. */
ret = connect(test_sd[tidx], (FAR const struct sockaddr *)&addr,
sizeof(addr));
-> usrsock_connect:
/* Wait for completion of request (or signal). */
ret = net_lockedwait(&state.recvsem);
чт, 20 февр. 2020 г. в 13:19, Oleg Evseev <ev.m...@gmail.com>:
> Hi all,
>
> Trying to run usrsocktest example from app:
> [image: изображение.png]
>
> 1) first two failed test in NoBlockRecv and BlockRecv fail because
> ret = recvfrom(sd, data, datalen, 0, (FAR struct sockaddr
> *)&remoteaddr, &addrlen);
> fills sin_zero in remoteaddr with some notzero values.
>
> [image: изображение.png]
> 2) BasicGetSockName fails because usrsock_getsockname doesn't check addr
> for not null, so test with NULL addr do not get expected error.
>
> 3) WakeWithSignal after this fails hangs up the app.
>
> I'm not blaming anyone and do not complain, please do not be offended.
> Thanks for all this work, really, but I'm in deep wonder does anybody run
> this example at least once before? I thought that usrsock is quite stable
> and I would like to concentrate on cell modem driver development and not
> the net/usrsock stack itself in which I have very little knowledge.
> I'm still thinking that I've set something wrong, especially due to fact
> that I'm playing with it through px4 project in fact (but using latest
> original Nuttx).
>
> Thanks for any thoughts.
>
> --
> With regards, Oleg.
>
