That would be a blatant, self-serving violations of the principles of the INVIOLABLES which you agreed to support.But, should we support the aged compiler to make the code ugly? I prefer to remove CAN_PASS_STRUCTS option and clean up the whole code base.
- mallinfo and CONFIG_CAN_PASS_STRUCTS Takashi Yamamoto
- Re: mallinfo and CONFIG_CAN_PASS_STRUCTS Xiang Xiao
- Re: mallinfo and CONFIG_CAN_PASS_STRUCTS Takashi Yamamoto
- Re: mallinfo and CONFIG_CAN_PASS_STRUCTS Xiang Xiao
- Re: mallinfo and CONFIG_CAN_PASS_STRUCTS Takashi Yamamoto
- Re: mallinfo and CONFIG_CAN_PASS_STRUCTS Gregory Nutt
- Re: mallinfo and CONFIG_CAN_PASS_STRUCTS Gregory Nutt
- Re: mallinfo and CONFIG_CAN_PASS_STRUCTS Gregory Nutt
- Re: mallinfo and CONFIG_CAN_PASS_STRUCTS Takashi Yamamoto
- Re: mallinfo and CONFIG_CAN_PASS_STRUCTS Gregory Nutt
- Re: mallinfo and CONFIG_CAN_PASS_STRUCTS Nathan Hartman
- Re: mallinfo and CONFIG_CAN_PASS_ST... Gregory Nutt
- Re: mallinfo and CONFIG_CAN_PAS... Nathan Hartman
- Re: mallinfo and CONFIG_CAN_PASS_STRUCTS Xiang Xiao
- Re: mallinfo and CONFIG_CAN_PASS_STRUCTS Gregory Nutt
- Re: mallinfo and CONFIG_CAN_PASS_STRUCTS Nathan Hartman