Sure, Matias. I was not addressing your proposition in any way. I was just commenting on existing format of READMEs.
I am neutral regarding separate repository with documentation. At least at the moment, I need to sleep with the idea (more). Some if not all READMES will stay in the repository and I was suggesting reformatting them. Am Fr., 17. Juli 2020 um 17:59 Uhr schrieb Matias N. <mat...@imap.cc>: > > > What I think would be great, is to pick any of this two standards. > > What I was trying to convey in my previous e-mail is that we can choose > Markdown for READMEs (the prefered choice, IMHO) and either Markdown, RST, > or anything else for the eventual doc-repo. These are independent choices, > one does not have to affect the other. In fact, maybe RST is better for the > doc-repo, since it supports richer syntax more apropriate for building > documentation. > > Best, > Matias
