Hi Brennan, Thank you for merging the RX Toolchain in NuttX testing repo. Now, we are fixing the warnings in the RX65N board build. Once the warnings are fixed, I would like to add the RX65N board build in CI.
Can I add a new job (new testlist "renesas.dat" for RX65N board building) in CI or add the RX65N board to the existing arm testlist (like "arm-13.dat")? Note: RX65N board can't be added to "avr-mips-riscv-x86-xtensa.dat" testlist, since RX Toolchain is added only for Linux. Best Regards Ramya N ________________________________ From: Ramya N <ramy...@tataelxsi.co.in.INVALID> Sent: 19 August 2020 19:24 To: dev@nuttx.apache.org <dev@nuttx.apache.org> Subject: Re: Pre-check flow ________________________________ **This is an external email. Please check the sender’s full email address (not just the sender name) and exercise caution before you respond or click any embedded link/attachment.** ________________________________ Brennan, Thank you for your comment. As suggested, I've opened a PR for RX toolchain inclusion. Best Regards, Ramya N ________________________________ From: Brennan Ashton <bash...@brennanashton.com> Sent: 17 August 2020 22:26 To: dev@nuttx.apache.org <dev@nuttx.apache.org> Subject: Re: Pre-check flow ________________________________ **This is an external email. Please check the sender’s full email address (not just the sender name) and exercise caution before you respond or click any embedded link/attachment.** ________________________________ Ramya, Apologies, for the delay. I think what would make the most sense to start just updating the existing Docker file to include a new build stage for the toolchain and open a PR. We can then look at the build time and move things around a bit if we need to. One of the things that we can do is publish an image that contains the rx build stage and then pull that when doing later build in the CI. This will let us skip building that stage if it is untouched. --Brennan On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 5:35 AM Ramya N <ramy...@tataelxsi.co.in.invalid> wrote: > > Hi Brennan, > > Can you please share your comments regarding the build time for container as > shared in the previous mail. > > Best Regards, > Ramya N > ________________________________ > From: Ramya N <ramy...@tataelxsi.co.in.INVALID> > Sent: 12 August 2020 20:37 > To: dev@nuttx.apache.org <dev@nuttx.apache.org> > Subject: Re: Pre-check flow > > ________________________________ > **This is an external email. Please check the sender’s full email address > (not just the sender name) and exercise caution before you respond or click > any embedded link/attachment.** > ________________________________ > > Hi, > > I am planning to add RX Toolchain for the Renesas architecture (for RX65N > board) with reference to the build steps provided in the below URL, > https://apc01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgcc-renesas.com%2Fwiki%2Findex.php%3Ftitle%3DHow_to_build_the_RX_Toolchain_under_Ubuntu_14.04&data=02%7C01%7Cramya.n%40tataelxsi.co.in%7Cddf604f9bd164ef3da3108d844478027%7Cad6a39dd96b6436882daf2ec4d92e26a%7C0%7C1%7C637334421185736354&sdata=WIXGoLqUDnER8W%2BfqXoWyuZ7MzTgfJbMUXSO83lDis8%3D&reserved=0 > > I checked on the local build time for the container when RX Toolchain is > added. Build time would be increased to 30 minutes (approx). > > I'm new to the docker container setup in the github. Is there any reference > available for publishing the intermediate container and using it when > building? > > Does "publish the intermediate container" mean pushing the Dockerfile (with > RX toolchain) to incubator-nuttx-testing repo? > > Best Regards, > Ramya N > ________________________________ > From: Brennan Ashton <bash...@brennanashton.com> > Sent: 11 August 2020 10:29 > To: dev@nuttx.apache.org <dev@nuttx.apache.org> > Subject: Re: Pre-check flow > > ________________________________ > **This is an external email. Please check the sender’s full email address > (not just the sender name) and exercise caution before you respond or click > any embedded link/attachment.** > ________________________________ > > On Mon, Aug 10, 2020, 9:42 PM Xiang Xiao <xiaoxiang781...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Ramya N <ramy...@tataelxsi.co.in.INVALID> > > > Sent: Monday, August 10, 2020 10:42 PM > > > To: dev@nuttx.apache.org > > > Subject: Pre-check flow > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > 1. In the NuttX Pre-check flow, docker image is built from "Pre-built > > Toolchain" of each architecture. If the pre-built toolchain > > is not > > > available, can we build the toolchain from "Toolchain Source Code" in > > the Dockerfile of incubator-nuttx-testing repo? > > > > > > > I think so, but Brennan can give more input. > > > > We can although I would like more details on this. I don't want to give > people horrible build times for the container so it might make sense to > publish the intermediate container as well and use that when building. > > Can you share what architecture and compiler you are wanting to add? > > --Brennan > > > > ________________________________ > Disclaimer: This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and > intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are > addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this message , or if this > message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert the > sender by reply email and then delete this message and any attachments. If > you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, > dissemination, copying, or storage of this message or its attachments is > strictly prohibited. Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or > error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender, therefore, does > not accept liability for any errors, omissions or contaminations in the > contents of this message which might have occurred as a result of email > transmission. If verification is required, please request for a hard-copy > version. > ________________________________
