Hi Michael, Of course you are much closer to the problem than I am. So here is just my opinion based on the stm32, stm32f7, stm32h7 lessons.
Are the L5 and U5 the same with different marketing names or are there underlying IP differences? What is the delta? I would head the direction of splitting them up unless there are only minor pin map differences and then do those as wrapped includes (see the stm32F412). The decoupling adds maintenance overhead but prevents the breakage that we endured in the stm32. David On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 10:54 PM Michael Jung <mij...@gmx.net> wrote: > Hello everybody, > > I have started to work on STM32U5 support for Apache NuttX and would like > to get some feedback on how this should be integrated. Realizing that > support STM32F0, STM32L0 and STM32G0 is all handled within > /arch/arm/src/stm32l0g0f0, I would like to rename /arch/arch/src/stm32l5 to > /arch/arm/src/stm32l5u5 and change filenames and literals accordingly. > Would you please let me know whether corresponding changes will be > acceptable? > > Thanks! > Michael >
