This is the sheet (a little old now) that I had shared out: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qMQV_CSN5Ka13_wr73QNo2Uh-NiSumjcwINuc0BkyIs
My goal had been to functional test as much as I could for that release, and I did find a bunch of little things to fix that I think made for a better release in the end. --Brennan On Wed, Mar 8, 2023, 4:53 PM Alan C. Assis <acas...@gmail.com> wrote: > Agreed! Let's keep it in a separated thread. > > Sometime ago I was talking with Brennan about listing the board that I > have here and he surprised me showing this board listing spreadsheet > on google docs. Maybe we can organize a listing to see who has board > X, Y, or Z and to make it possible to test NuttX on all possible > boards. > > I have a special interested to find the launchxl-tms57004 because it > supports big-endian and I think there nobody testing NuttX on > big-endian (except maybe Zou/fft, he is using NuttX on Sparc arch that > is big-endian). So Greg, if you have this board I'm interest to get > it. > > Few days ago I found (and bought) on eBay from Australia the first > board that I tested NuttX in 2010: > https://acassis.wordpress.com/2010/08/01/getting-started-to-nuttx/ > > It could be an interesting test also to see how big NuttX became 13 years > later. > > BR, > > Alan > > On 3/8/23, Sebastien Lorquet <sebast...@lorquet.fr> wrote: > > This needs to be in its own thread. > > > > Your collection of boards probably got some historical value. > > > > Sebastien > > > > On 3/8/23 23:31, Gregory Nutt wrote: > >> Slightly different topic: I have almost every board that ever ran > >> NuttX from about 2005 through 2020 or so. That is probably several > >> hundred boards. I don't use them any more and am thinking about just > >> dumping them to make space. Is there anyone willing to pay the > >> shipping from Costa Rica on a massive dump of older but interesting > >> hardware? > > >
