I have 90-95% of those boards.Sent from my Galaxy
-------- Original message --------From: Brennan Ashton
<bash...@brennanashton.com> Date: 3/8/23 7:29 PM (GMT-06:00) To:
dev@nuttx.apache.org Subject: Re: NuttX Hardware This is the sheet (a little
old now) that I had shared
out:https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qMQV_CSN5Ka13_wr73QNo2Uh-NiSumjcwINuc0BkyIsMy
goal had been to functional test as much as I could for that release,and I did
find a bunch of little things to fix that I think made for abetter release in
the end.--BrennanOn Wed, Mar 8, 2023, 4:53 PM Alan C. Assis <acas...@gmail.com>
wrote:> Agreed! Let's keep it in a separated thread.>> Sometime ago I was
talking with Brennan about listing the board that I> have here and he surprised
me showing this board listing spreadsheet> on google docs. Maybe we can
organize a listing to see who has board> X, Y, or Z and to make it possible to
test NuttX on all possible> boards.>> I have a special interested to find the
launchxl-tms57004 because it> supports big-endian and I think there nobody
testing NuttX on> big-endian (except maybe Zou/fft, he is using NuttX on Sparc
arch that> is big-endian). So Greg, if you have this board I'm interest to get>
it.>> Few days ago I found (and bought) on eBay from Australia the first> board
that I tested NuttX in 2010:>
https://acassis.wordpress.com/2010/08/01/getting-started-to-nuttx/>> It could
be an interesting test also to see how big NuttX became 13 years> later.>>
BR,>> Alan>> On 3/8/23, Sebastien Lorquet <sebast...@lorquet.fr> wrote:> > This
needs to be in its own thread.> >> > Your collection of boards probably got
some historical value.> >> > Sebastien> >> > On 3/8/23 23:31, Gregory Nutt
wrote:> >> Slightly different topic: I have almost every board that ever ran>
>> NuttX from about 2005 through 2020 or so. That is probably several> >>
hundred boards. I don't use them any more and am thinking about just> >>
dumping them to make space. Is there anyone willing to pay the> >> shipping
from Costa Rica on a massive dump of older but interesting> >> hardware?> >>
