Hi Tomek, Thank you for raising these good points and thank YF for suggesting it.
I also don't know much details about it, maybe I think at list on Linux we have some other libs working between X11 and Wayland to make "legacy" code work correctly. I'm CC Nicolas Caramelli who recently added support to DirectFB2 ( https://github.com/directfb2/DirectFB2) on NuttX, maybe (or maybe not) he could help us to get a better vision of it. Another advantage when thinking about X11 port to NuttX is because nanox/microwindows is an implementation that does exactly that. Also keep in mind that what RT-Thread did was just add support to use weston in the host, something NuttX has more than 3 years ago and works on X11 and Wayland. Their weston port (AFAIK) doesn't support any embedded board directly. BR, Alan On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 1:35 AM Tomek CEDRO <to...@cedro.info> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 1:42 AM yfliu2008 wrote: > > How about adding Wayland instead of X11? It seems RT-Thread can run > weston now. > > * Wayland is basically a framebuffer. > * What are advantages of Wayland over X11 here? > * How would that support porting known libraries and applications to NuttX? > * What would be estimated workload and result? > * Would you like to port Wayland to NuttX? > > -- > CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info >
