Hello again,
I have warned about this problem for YEARS AND YEARS and it happened
EXACTLY as I had seen.
It is a good thing to be honest, that will reduce the amount of work
from nuttx maintainers.
If openvela (as I understand) has good features added by xiaomi, it is
the task of nuttx to upstream them as they wish, in a calm and positive
way, by taking enough time to think about the design and structure,
without all the stress and speed of a commercial corporate project.
NuttX is not a commercial project. it has no targets to reach and no
investors to please.
It is a much nicer way to work and I think it is better like that.
It is a good thing to have less xiaomi contributions forced in nuttx.
I think we can thank them for their past contributions that made nuttx
grow, but it is also a good thing to realize when it must stop (eg,
before NuttX becomes XiaomiX).
Sebastien
On 2/4/26 10:11, raiden00pl wrote:
I think the root cause is completely different. The real problem here is
Xiaomi's
attempt to add changes from its entire annual development cycle. Year of
changes
from a large development team to an open source community with fewer than
10 active
members. The community is flooded with changes it can't process, and Xiaomi
is
blocked because they can't add further changes based on unmerged changes.
The tension is rising, and we have what we have: a disaster. This approach
is
an obvious recipe for failure.
This approach hasn't worked recently, and it's not working now. The Xiaomi
team
is growing much faster than the NuttX community. The number of changes from
Xiaomi
is growing, and it has now reached absurd proportions.
If these changes were added gradually, without waiting for the end of the
year,
the problem would be much smaller.
