Exactly Alin! I think we need to find a middle ground, without the need for AI to generate Summary comments.
The Summary, Impact and Testing shouldn't be complex, just few lines explaining what the goal of the PR, what is the benefit/drawback and the output of nsh> showing the test. BR, Alan On Wed, Feb 4, 2026 at 8:27 AM Alin Jerpelea <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > It is sad to loose one of our contributors and would be worth trying to > have a mature conversation to > solve the issue. > > We, as a community, have our points while companies face many bottlenecks > with their upstream work. > > The guidelines have improved the quality for a short time until new > generated comments appeared and > we were overwhelmed by the incoming contributions quantity and quality. > > I think that we should both talk, outline the issues and find solutions in > a constructive way to avoid friction. > > Bet regards > Alin > > > On Wed, Feb 4, 2026 at 12:17 PM Alan C. Assis <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Mateusz, > > > > No, please don't! Everyone here is mature (ok, not everybody) to solve > our > > own problems. > > > > Please we don't need to ask "Momy" to solve our fight with our brothers. > > :-) > > > > BR, > > > > Alan > > > > On Wed, Feb 4, 2026 at 7:32 AM raiden00pl <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Maybe it's worth contacting the Apache Foundation for help? Could they > > > offer some > > > advice on how to handle problems we have here? Like how to handle > > > situations where > > > contributions exceed the community's capacity to process them? > > > > > > I think there are many open source projects bigger than NuttX, that > deal > > > with such > > > problems with systemic approach. We're not the first project to have > such > > > problems. I'm sure the Apache Foundation is full of great people with > > > experience in > > > managing big projects, maybe it's worth asking for advice? > > > > > > Of course, I disagree with Sebastian. For me, Xiaomi leaving the > project > > > would be > > > a sign of the death of NuttX. To be clear: Xiaomi pays me so I'm > biased, > > > but still > > > about 90% of my contributions to this project were made in my free > time, > > > for free. > > > > > > It's sad to say but [my opinion now] without Xiaomi, this project would > > > have been dead > > > long ago and I personally would lose any interest in NuttX. > > > > > > > > > śr., 4 lut 2026 o 11:09 chao an <[email protected]> napisał(a): > > > > > > > @Sebastien Lorquet <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > I’ve had just about enough of your toxic, hypocritical nonsense. > Let’s > > > cut > > > > through your garbage and talk facts: > > > > > > > > 1. 1. Xiaomi’s contributions to NuttX are undeniable. > > > > Their work has driven real progress, fixed critical issues, and > > > expanded > > > > the project’s capabilities. If you’re so unhappy with the > community, > > > no > > > > one > > > > is forcing you to stay—feel free to leave and stop poisoning the > > space > > > > with > > > > your negativity. > > > > And for the record: I work at ByteDance (TikTok), so I have zero > > > > affiliation with Xiaomi. This isn’t a defense of a company—it’s a > > > > defense > > > > of basic fairness and respect for people who actually contribute > to > > > this > > > > project. > > > > 2. *2. Let’s talk about your track record.* > > > > - 90% of your commits are trivial, history-driven busywork. Your > > > > so-called “contributions” are negligible at best. > > > > - When was the last time you reviewed a core code change, or > > > > contributed to the CI/CD pipeline that keeps this project > > running? > > > > You’ve > > > > done nothing to move NuttX forward, yet you love to sit on the > > > > sidelines > > > > and trash people who *actually* do the work. > > > > - You have zero credibility to judge anyone else’s > contributions. > > > > > > > > 3. 3. Shut your mouth already. > > > > Every time I see your bitter, passive-aggressive posts, I feel > sick. > > > > You’re nothing but a keyboard warrior, a technical fraud who loves > > to > > > > run > > > > his mouth while contributing nothing of value. Your constant > > > negativity > > > > isn’t constructive—it’s just sad. > > > > > > > > > > > > If you can’t contribute positively or keep your toxic opinions to > > > yourself, > > > > do us all a favor and disappear from this community. We don’t need > your > > > > kind here. > > > > > > > > > > > > Sebastien Lorquet <[email protected]> 于2026年2月4日周三 17:33写道： > > > > > > > > > Hello again, > > > > > > > > > > I have warned about this problem for YEARS AND YEARS and it > happened > > > > > EXACTLY as I had seen. > > > > > > > > > > It is a good thing to be honest, that will reduce the amount of > work > > > > > from nuttx maintainers. > > > > > > > > > > If openvela (as I understand) has good features added by xiaomi, it > > is > > > > > the task of nuttx to upstream them as they wish, in a calm and > > positive > > > > > way, by taking enough time to think about the design and structure, > > > > > without all the stress and speed of a commercial corporate project. > > > > > > > > > > NuttX is not a commercial project. it has no targets to reach and > no > > > > > investors to please. > > > > > > > > > > It is a much nicer way to work and I think it is better like that. > > > > > > > > > > It is a good thing to have less xiaomi contributions forced in > nuttx. > > > > > > > > > > I think we can thank them for their past contributions that made > > nuttx > > > > > grow, but it is also a good thing to realize when it must stop (eg, > > > > > before NuttX becomes XiaomiX). > > > > > > > > > > Sebastien > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 2/4/26 10:11, raiden00pl wrote: > > > > > > I think the root cause is completely different. The real problem > > here > > > > is > > > > > > Xiaomi's > > > > > > attempt to add changes from its entire annual development cycle. > > Year > > > > of > > > > > > changes > > > > > > from a large development team to an open source community with > > fewer > > > > than > > > > > > 10 active > > > > > > members. The community is flooded with changes it can't process, > > and > > > > > Xiaomi > > > > > > is > > > > > > blocked because they can't add further changes based on unmerged > > > > changes. > > > > > > The tension is rising, and we have what we have: a disaster. This > > > > > approach > > > > > > is > > > > > > an obvious recipe for failure. > > > > > > > > > > > > This approach hasn't worked recently, and it's not working now. > The > > > > > Xiaomi > > > > > > team > > > > > > is growing much faster than the NuttX community. The number of > > > changes > > > > > from > > > > > > Xiaomi > > > > > > is growing, and it has now reached absurd proportions. > > > > > > If these changes were added gradually, without waiting for the > end > > of > > > > the > > > > > > year, > > > > > > the problem would be much smaller. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
