I said nothing new.
your message is a gross misunderstanding and I have no patience to fix
your view.
I will just say that you are wrong believing I globally disrespect
xiaomi contribution, this is shamefully ridiculous and against all
publicly observable facts.
My view is much more subtle than that, but apparently you dont care.
BTW, judging value of people by measuring their number of commits is
absolutely a ridiculous joke and I will not ridicule myself by trying to
justify my contributions to nuttx.
Did it cross your mind that may be I stopped contributing because of
something?
And who has time rewiewing hundreds of pull requests in subsystems I
have zero expertise on, when I'm not paid to do so and it is not my full
time job?
I dont want money - I want time.
sebastien
On 2/4/26 11:08, chao an wrote:
@Sebastien Lorquet <[email protected]>
I’ve had just about enough of your toxic, hypocritical nonsense. Let’s cut
through your garbage and talk facts:
1. 1. Xiaomi’s contributions to NuttX are undeniable.
Their work has driven real progress, fixed critical issues, and expanded
the project’s capabilities. If you’re so unhappy with the community, no one
is forcing you to stay—feel free to leave and stop poisoning the space with
your negativity.
And for the record: I work at ByteDance (TikTok), so I have zero
affiliation with Xiaomi. This isn’t a defense of a company—it’s a defense
of basic fairness and respect for people who actually contribute to this
project.
2. *2. Let’s talk about your track record.*
- 90% of your commits are trivial, history-driven busywork. Your
so-called “contributions” are negligible at best.
- When was the last time you reviewed a core code change, or
contributed to the CI/CD pipeline that keeps this project running? You’ve
done nothing to move NuttX forward, yet you love to sit on the sidelines
and trash people who *actually* do the work.
- You have zero credibility to judge anyone else’s contributions.
3. 3. Shut your mouth already.
Every time I see your bitter, passive-aggressive posts, I feel sick.
You’re nothing but a keyboard warrior, a technical fraud who loves to run
his mouth while contributing nothing of value. Your constant negativity
isn’t constructive—it’s just sad.
If you can’t contribute positively or keep your toxic opinions to yourself,
do us all a favor and disappear from this community. We don’t need your
kind here.
Sebastien Lorquet <[email protected]> 于2026年2月4日周三 17:33写道：
Hello again,
I have warned about this problem for YEARS AND YEARS and it happened
EXACTLY as I had seen.
It is a good thing to be honest, that will reduce the amount of work
from nuttx maintainers.
If openvela (as I understand) has good features added by xiaomi, it is
the task of nuttx to upstream them as they wish, in a calm and positive
way, by taking enough time to think about the design and structure,
without all the stress and speed of a commercial corporate project.
NuttX is not a commercial project. it has no targets to reach and no
investors to please.
It is a much nicer way to work and I think it is better like that.
It is a good thing to have less xiaomi contributions forced in nuttx.
I think we can thank them for their past contributions that made nuttx
grow, but it is also a good thing to realize when it must stop (eg,
before NuttX becomes XiaomiX).
Sebastien
On 2/4/26 10:11, raiden00pl wrote:
I think the root cause is completely different. The real problem here is
Xiaomi's
attempt to add changes from its entire annual development cycle. Year of
changes
from a large development team to an open source community with fewer than
10 active
members. The community is flooded with changes it can't process, and
Xiaomi
is
blocked because they can't add further changes based on unmerged changes.
The tension is rising, and we have what we have: a disaster. This
approach
is
an obvious recipe for failure.
This approach hasn't worked recently, and it's not working now. The
Xiaomi
team
is growing much faster than the NuttX community. The number of changes
from
Xiaomi
is growing, and it has now reached absurd proportions.
If these changes were added gradually, without waiting for the end of the
year,
the problem would be much smaller.
