Whether or how a developer uses AI is a personal decision. What I am against is creating a rule to forbid the patch the developer generated with AI.
On Fri, Jul 3, 2026 at 2:33 PM Michał Łyszczek <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2026-07-02 18:54:44, Sebastien Lorquet wrote: > > Everything about "ai" is wrong and problematic, even if you want to > tolerate > > one aspect, it stays unacceptaoone has asked me either, but I 100% agree > with those. > > > > -quality is unacceptable, > > > > -environnemental impact is unacceptable > > > > -ethics are unacceptable > > > > -it is completely unsustainable on the financial and industrial levels > > > > -above all, it renders humans incapable and addicted to a centralized > system > > owned by billionaires > > > > -it destroys communities and cultures > > Noone has asked me, but I agree with Sebastian here and I am rather > against using LLMs myself too. > > I don't like that my code is used by corporations to create their product > any > money that they use to addict you to the tech. It's one thing when a human > reads > my GPL code and uses very similar code to implement something in the > company. He > did benefit from it somehow, he got smarter, maybe he saved his job, > whatever, > but he's the primary benefactor. > > With LLM? Company benefits first. And the dude may even loose his job > because of > LLM. And I want for people first to benefit from my work - not > corporations. > > Also LLM makes you dumber. Especially if you are learning. I use LLM > sometimes > as search engine or example generator. But even with that, I can feel my > brain > getting lazy and poking me to use LLM for that quick solution. From one > point > it's cool to get solution faster, but on the other hand, we will loose > ability > to solve problems on our own. > > I can see benefits of LLM. Like the time you guys used it to refactor stm32 > source file to be more structured. Yeah, I think that's good use for LLM. > But > there are just much more bad use cases. > > Can't speak for anyone, but I avoid LLMs mainly for my and my brain's > sake. I > believe LLM will cause more harm than good. Especially in the future, when > experienced programmers pre-llm era will start to die out. >
