Actually, I don't care the code is created by humans or LLM, all patches are equal to me and must pass my quality bar before I approve it.
On Fri, Jul 3, 2026 at 2:44 PM Xiang Xiao <[email protected]> wrote: > Whether or how a developer uses AI is a personal decision. What I am > against is creating a rule to forbid the patch the developer generated with > AI. > > On Fri, Jul 3, 2026 at 2:33 PM Michał Łyszczek <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> On 2026-07-02 18:54:44, Sebastien Lorquet wrote: >> > Everything about "ai" is wrong and problematic, even if you want to >> tolerate >> > one aspect, it stays unacceptaoone has asked me either, but I 100% >> agree with those. >> > >> > -quality is unacceptable, >> > >> > -environnemental impact is unacceptable >> > >> > -ethics are unacceptable >> > >> > -it is completely unsustainable on the financial and industrial levels >> > >> > -above all, it renders humans incapable and addicted to a centralized >> system >> > owned by billionaires >> > >> > -it destroys communities and cultures >> >> Noone has asked me, but I agree with Sebastian here and I am rather >> against using LLMs myself too. >> >> I don't like that my code is used by corporations to create their product >> any >> money that they use to addict you to the tech. It's one thing when a >> human reads >> my GPL code and uses very similar code to implement something in the >> company. He >> did benefit from it somehow, he got smarter, maybe he saved his job, >> whatever, >> but he's the primary benefactor. >> >> With LLM? Company benefits first. And the dude may even loose his job >> because of >> LLM. And I want for people first to benefit from my work - not >> corporations. >> >> Also LLM makes you dumber. Especially if you are learning. I use LLM >> sometimes >> as search engine or example generator. But even with that, I can feel my >> brain >> getting lazy and poking me to use LLM for that quick solution. From one >> point >> it's cool to get solution faster, but on the other hand, we will loose >> ability >> to solve problems on our own. >> >> I can see benefits of LLM. Like the time you guys used it to refactor >> stm32 >> source file to be more structured. Yeah, I think that's good use for LLM. >> But >> there are just much more bad use cases. >> >> Can't speak for anyone, but I avoid LLMs mainly for my and my brain's >> sake. I >> believe LLM will cause more harm than good. Especially in the future, when >> experienced programmers pre-llm era will start to die out. >> >
