Re: Board Report Draft - Please Review ASAP

[David E. Jones]

-David


On Jan 13, 2007, at 10:27 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:

If there is enough interest in it then we should certainly go for it, or at least consider it. The main reason I don't like it is because it doesn't represent the proposed branching process very well.

This was only a suggestion, I like it because with this you have more information than just a number. But I will not push more for

this...

Jacques

----- Original Message -----
From: "David E. Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <dev@ofbiz.apache.org>
Sent: Saturday, January 13, 2007 5:13 PM
Subject: Re: Board Report Draft - Please Review ASAP

On Jan 13, 2007, at 4:15 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:

BTW David, I put a comment as answer to your question about release in

http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBADMIN/Release+Plan?
focusedCommentId=1027#comment-1027

Yeah, this sort of thing should probably be discussed on the mailing
list and then once discussed we can decide if any change to the
document needs to be done.

I'm not so sure about the Ubuntu versioning mechanism... I think it
is much more clear if each branch we do is represented by a major/
minor version number change, and then follow on releases within that
branch would be represented by the sub-minor version number change.

Anyway, this is described in the General Release Policies.

Are you saying that you propose to do this differently?

-David

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature